Package Details: spideroak-one 7.5.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/spideroak-one.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: spideroak-one
Description: Secure file backup, sync and sharing client. SpiderOak One client.
Upstream URL: https://crossclave.com/
Keywords: backup
Licenses: LicenseRef-SpiderOakONE
Provides: spideroak
Submitter: warnem2
Maintainer: warnem2
Last Packager: warnem2
Votes: 267
Popularity: 0.083957
First Submitted: 2015-07-18 19:17 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-04-20 03:51 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 29 Next › Last »

warnem2 commented on 2016-02-05 02:54 (UTC)

I've updated the package to v6.1.2, and made some additional changes to the PKGBUILD as suggested by @andreyv. As always, please let me know if anything should be fixed or could be improved. Thanks!

andreyv commented on 2016-01-03 21:14 (UTC)

Hello, I have some suggestions to improve this package: - Instead of "if CARCH == ..." source_x86_64 and source_i686 can be used (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#source) - The etc/ directory in the package is not needed (it only contains /etc/apt/sources.list.d/spideroakone.list) - desktop-file-utils should be in depends because it is called in the install script - There is a namcap warning amongst others: spideroak-one E: Missing custom license directory (usr/share/licenses/spideroak-one) It looks like terms.txt should be installed as LICENSE, but isn't.

gumper commented on 2015-09-08 16:55 (UTC)

I contacted their support about the issue. Let's see what they have to say.

warnem2 commented on 2015-09-08 13:56 (UTC)

@gumper - I still believe it's an upstream issue. I've experienced the same thing, but I haven't remembered to contact the vendor about it. Their support page is at https://spideroak.com/support.

gumper commented on 2015-09-08 13:17 (UTC)

I'm currently seeing the same issue that Infinitezero had, when I have the backup frequency set to "automatic", SpiderOak will not find any changes. I have to set the frequency to one of the time selections in order for it to find the changes. His fix was to create the package using the deb file from Spideroak, but the current PKGBUILD is already doing that. Any suggestions on how to correct this issue?

k2s commented on 2015-08-19 23:36 (UTC)

new version 6.0.1 here https://spideroak.com/resources/release-notes

k2s commented on 2015-08-19 23:36 (UTC)

had to update for x86_64: 7baa2573756ce174fbdff882be21de2306580de12d31cf760b706da72efdb711

cb474 commented on 2015-07-28 17:48 (UTC)

Thanks coolpyrofreak. Seems to have updated fine. Though I am not a fan of the new interface.

warnem2 commented on 2015-07-19 01:43 (UTC)

@cb474 - I set the PKGBUILD for this to conflict with the original spideroak package, so pacman should prompt you to remove spideroak before installing spideroak-one. Based on my experience, it should be a seamless transition and you shouldn't lose anything, but YMMV.

cb474 commented on 2015-07-19 01:02 (UTC)

So when I install this will it automatically replace 5.2 from old AUR? Do I have to uninstall 5.2 first? Am I going to lose my settings and have to set up SpiderOak all over again? Thanks for any details on that. And thanks for maintaining and upgrading the package.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 29 Next › Last »