Search Criteria
Package Details: texlab-git 5.12.0.r0.b4c5d27-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/texlab-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | texlab-git |
Description: | An implementation of the Language Server Protocol for LaTeX |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/latex-lsp/texlab |
Licenses: | MIT |
Conflicts: | texlab |
Provides: | texlab |
Submitter: | he-la |
Maintainer: | ralphptorres |
Last Packager: | ralphptorres |
Votes: | 1 |
Popularity: | 0.000139 |
First Submitted: | 2019-05-03 13:56 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-12-04 18:04 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- cargo (rustup-gitAUR, rust-nightly-binAUR, rust-gitAUR, rust-beta-binAUR, rustup-stubAUR, rust, rustup) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
Required by (4)
- helix-ext (requires texlab) (optional)
- kate-git (requires texlab) (optional)
- kate-root (requires texlab) (optional)
- tree-sitter-bibtex-git (requires texlab) (optional)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
ralphptorres commented on 2023-11-23 02:56 (UTC)
Oh, you're right. I tried that before but perhaps I did something wrong. Anyway, updated. Thanks! (i'm new to packaging; still learning :))
nightuser commented on 2023-11-22 18:24 (UTC) (edited on 2023-11-22 18:26 (UTC) by nightuser)
Hi @ralphptorres. You don't need an explicit
mkdir
since you're usinginstall
: just use the-t
flag here,-D
already takes care of creating missing directories.mkdir
might have some issues with non-standard umask.ralphptorres commented on 2023-11-21 04:49 (UTC)
Was an oversight, should be okay now. Thanks for reporting.
elimik31 commented on 2023-11-20 13:30 (UTC) (edited on 2023-11-20 13:30 (UTC) by elimik31)
Currently installation fails for me with
Did a completely cleanbuild with paru and also tried makepkg directly. I assume doc-installation is now opt-in, i.e. requires some extra parameter or command. My hotfix is just to comment out the doc installation in line 47 as I don't really need that, i.e.
But a proper fix would be to just add the command to build it in the first place
ralphptorres commented on 2023-11-16 08:39 (UTC)
Requiring
extra/texlive-binextra
(optionally or not) just forchktex
is too much for users especially those who have minimal latex installation. Thus it would be hard to recommend it as an optional dependency.Atman commented on 2023-10-04 12:37 (UTC)
Hi, texlab optionally uses chktex for linting, seemingly relying on the executable being in the PATH. Especially when using Tectonic as texlab's build system, this is likely not the case as chktex (as well as latexindent which can also be optionally used with texlab) is usually provided by
extra/texlive-binextra
.Would adding
extra/texlive-binextra
as an optional dependency be reasonable?byrongibby commented on 2021-07-26 08:25 (UTC)
PKGBUILD didn't seem to install the necessary toolchain? I manually installed rustup and ran
rustup toolchain install stable
in order to successfully complete the install.PythonNut commented on 2019-09-13 02:34 (UTC)
Also depends on node and npm?
he-la commented on 2019-09-06 14:33 (UTC) (edited on 2020-06-28 09:49 (UTC) by he-la)
EDIT: The rust packaging situation seems to have stabilised somewhat and things should work as expected. A remaining issue is the incompatibility between the rust and the rustup package; if you do not want to install multiple versions of rust, feel free to change the make dependency to rust rather than rustup.
Hey everyone, sorry for the delay. I still cannot get a consistently successful build on all of my systems, but it works in a basic docker container and hence hopefully works for a lot of scenarios, so I decided to update the package regardless of the remaining issues. If you run into any issues and figure out how to resolve them, please shoot me a message. Alternatively, use the non-git "texlab" package from the aur.
efoerster commented on 2019-08-20 16:46 (UTC)
Hey, I have create a versioned AUR package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/texlab/) with the newest version. Feel free to adopt it.
1 2 Next › Last »