Search Criteria
Package Details: thrust 2.1.0-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/thrust.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | thrust |
Description: | A C++ parallel programming library which resembles the C++ Standard Library |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/thrust/thrust |
Keywords: | CUDA OpenMP TBB |
Licenses: | Apache |
Submitter: | zasdfgbnm |
Maintainer: | vicp74 |
Last Packager: | vicp74 |
Votes: | 4 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2017-02-04 19:29 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-04-18 05:44 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
vicp74 commented on 2022-04-18 18:39 (UTC)
@gnaggnoyil: Usually I'd say cub should be a separate package, but thrust now includes it, so I've also included it here and I gave it the same structure as in the git repository (hence cub in /opt/thrust). At Debian, for instance, they separate libthrust and libcub (https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/libthrust-dev). Is that what you're calling an ordinary installation? Check this thread to see why I didn't do it like that.
In any case, I'm not using standalone thrust anymore, so I don't test this package in production code to see if everything is building alright. If you wish to adopt and improve it, feel free message me.
gnaggnoyil commented on 2022-04-13 00:50 (UTC)
The header files are installed under
/opt/thrust/cub
and/opt/thrust/thrust
and the cmake package configuration files are installed under/opt/thrust/cub/cmake
and/opt/thrust/thrust/cmake
, which are different from an ordinary thrust installation. Is this intended behavior?vicp74 commented on 2020-08-03 16:27 (UTC) (edited on 2020-08-03 16:28 (UTC) by vicp74)
@petronny : Since your question involves both Thrust and CUB, I've made a post on the forums to discuss it and to avoid jumping between comments on this package and on CUB.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=257903
Everyone is welcome to reply with their thoughts there!
petronny commented on 2020-07-24 13:42 (UTC) (edited on 2020-07-24 13:42 (UTC) by petronny)
Hi, I'm the maintainer of
cub
on AUR.I've updated
cub
to1.9.10
and added you as a co-maintainer. You can update their pkgver at the same time :)BTW, should
cub
be splitted intocub
andcub-cuda
? Also shouldthrust
be splitted intothrust
andthrust-cuda
,thrust-intel
,thrust-openmp
?vicp74 commented on 2020-07-21 19:41 (UTC)
I've added cub as an integrated dependency, because that is what upstream recommends [1]. Besides, the other cub package on AUR is really outdated.
Please let me know if it's working correctly now.
[1] They say "It is recommended to simply delete your own version of CUB and use the version of CUB that comes with Thrust." on the CHANGELOG for v1.9.10
bartus commented on 2020-07-17 08:33 (UTC) (edited on 2020-07-17 08:53 (UTC) by bartus)
cub
dependency is missing !!Since
thrust 1.9.8
internal version ofcub
was removed andthrust
relies on system one (cub_version==thrust_version).Patch
Already posted
out of deta
request forcub