Package Details: unifi 9.5.21-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/unifi.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: unifi
Description: Centralized management system for Ubiquiti UniFi AP
Upstream URL: https://unifi-network.ui.com
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: tomcat-native
Submitter: seblu
Maintainer: freswa
Last Packager: freswa
Votes: 72
Popularity: 0.34
First Submitted: 2017-08-22 01:31 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-10-14 14:46 (UTC)

Dependencies (3)

Required by (0)

Sources (6)

Pinned Comments

freswa commented on 2019-10-30 11:50 (UTC)

We are on Stable with this Package. Please flag out-of-date only if the Version provided with this package does not match the version under "Stable" in this link: https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/360008240754#1

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 24 Next › Last »

al7lem commented on 2025-08-02 16:07 (UTC)

We are waiting the new version :) 9.3

ipaqmaster commented on 2025-05-12 00:43 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-12 00:49 (UTC) by ipaqmaster)

Looks like --add-opens has been deprecated?

systemctl status unifi Unrecognized option: --add-opens

Edit: My bad was using java-8-openjdk/jre

Fixed with archlinux-java set java-17-openjdk

boudekerk commented on 2025-01-06 16:41 (UTC)

Ah, thanks for clarifying.

Scimmia commented on 2025-01-06 16:27 (UTC)

We're not talking about conflicting packages here. "11 only satisfies <=21, 23 only >=17" literally means that both are met when both packages are installed.

boudekerk commented on 2025-01-06 16:25 (UTC)

They surely wouldn't all be met, 11 only satisfies <=21, 23 only >=17. But I think you meant to say that only one (per package) has to be met?

The PKGBUILD documentation does suggest both would have to be met, they use an example just like this, but I admit I haven't tested this myself.

See: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#depends

Scimmia commented on 2025-01-06 16:05 (UTC)

All dependencies would be met. Nothing says that one package has to satisfy both.

boudekerk commented on 2025-01-06 16:04 (UTC)

@Scimmia

I'm personally fine with just 21, so happy to leave it up to the maintainer.

But for the record, the below wouldn't let you have 11 or 23 installed, as all dependencies have to be met. Only 17 & 21 would meet both.

Scimmia commented on 2025-01-06 16:01 (UTC)

boudekerk, being Arch, I would say that enforcing the newer version makes sense. Yes, it would be correct to have both, but it would also let someone have 11 and 23 installed, each would satisfy one dep yet you don't have one that works with this package.

boudekerk commented on 2025-01-06 15:46 (UTC) (edited on 2025-01-06 15:48 (UTC) by boudekerk)

I see the requirement has been changed to:

    java-runtime-headless=21

Wouldn't it have been better to make it:

     java-runtime-headless>=17
     java-runtime-headless<=21

boudekerk commented on 2025-01-06 14:13 (UTC)

Unifi 9.0.x support Java 21, but this package lists 17 as a required dependency. This should probably be relaxed.

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 24 Next › Last »