Search Criteria
Package Details: zfs-linux-headers 2.2.3_6.8.8.arch1.1-1
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/zfs-linux.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | zfs-linux |
| Description: | Kernel headers for the Zettabyte File System. |
| Upstream URL: | https://openzfs.org/ |
| Licenses: | CDDL |
| Conflicts: | spl-dkms, spl-dkms-git, spl-headers, zfs-dkms, zfs-dkms-git, zfs-dkms-rc, zfs-headers |
| Provides: | spl-headers, zfs-headers |
| Submitter: | demizer |
| Maintainer: | minextu (archzfs-bot) |
| Last Packager: | archzfs-bot |
| Votes: | 266 |
| Popularity: | 0.046356 |
| First Submitted: | 2016-04-21 08:45 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-05-01 16:47 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- kmod (kmod-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR)
- linux (linux-binAUR)
- zfs-utilsAUR (zfs-utils-rcAUR, zfs-linux-gitAUR, zfs-utils-gitAUR, zfs-utils-staging-gitAUR)
- linux-headers (linux-headers-binAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 78 Next › Last »
justinkb commented on 2018-02-06 04:48 (UTC)
Looks like my issue was caused by a critical bug in 4.15. I'm now on 4.15.1 with some patches and it works fine with the patch below
severach commented on 2018-02-01 00:48 (UTC)
There's nothing to fear. I've run zfs-git for 3 years and there has never been a data loss event. The only event was a performance problem that was fixed in 4 hours.
justinkb commented on 2018-01-31 23:13 (UTC) (edited on 2018-01-31 23:19 (UTC) by justinkb)
I build three sets of out-of-tree kmods, just ZFS, Vbox (which I don't think were even used/inserted) and nvidia-drivers. The only one I can conceivably see taking down those kernel subsystems are the ZFS filesystem drivers. But I'll try to see if any of the other two were responsible later tonight. PS. I don't actually even use arch anymore, but the arch community remains a very valuable resource so I still come here ;) PPS. I'm not brave enough to use the ZFS git master packages... not by a long shot. I have many terabytes of data in my ZFS pool
minextu commented on 2018-01-31 22:58 (UTC)
I haven't had any issues on 4.15 so far. Did you try using the git packages with 4.15? If you get the same problem there, it might be an upstream issue
justinkb commented on 2018-01-31 21:59 (UTC) (edited on 2018-01-31 22:00 (UTC) by justinkb)
Tried zfs on 4.15 with just the patch linked below, definitely not ready for primetime. Huge issues with the filesystem and even block device subsystems totally borking out (luckily didn't lose any data, other than some small files getting corrupted because of unclean shutdowns). Stay on 4.14.x for now
severach commented on 2018-01-31 06:20 (UTC) (edited on 2018-01-31 06:21 (UTC) by severach)
Easy! Get Oracle to relicense away from the CDDL to be non hostile to the GPL.
https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2016/feb/25/zfs-and-linux/
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/78v1c4/oracle_zfs_man_calls_for_big_red_to_let/
You're not the first to want this.
webdawg commented on 2018-01-31 05:02 (UTC)
What do we have to do to push this as an official package and get your more support?
ZFS is an incredible filesystem, having it as a rootfs can set archlinux apart.
justinkb commented on 2018-01-30 00:11 (UTC)
Ah, you're right. For some reason I thought it had
minextu commented on 2018-01-29 23:42 (UTC)
Yep, it hasn't changed though
justinkb commented on 2018-01-29 23:29 (UTC) (edited on 2018-01-29 23:30 (UTC) by justinkb)
This looks like an updated version of that patch that actually got merged upstream, and signed-off by one of the main developers of zfs, are you aware of it?
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/spl/commit/c9821f1ccc647dfbd506f381b736c664d862d126
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 78 Next › Last »