Search Criteria
Package Details: zfs-linux-headers 2.2.7_6.12.8.arch1.1-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/zfs-linux.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | zfs-linux |
Description: | Kernel headers for the Zettabyte File System. |
Upstream URL: | https://openzfs.org/ |
Keywords: | kernel linux openzfs zfs |
Licenses: | CDDL |
Conflicts: | spl-dkms, spl-dkms-git, spl-headers, zfs-dkms, zfs-dkms-git, zfs-dkms-rc, zfs-headers |
Provides: | spl-headers, zfs-headers |
Submitter: | demizer |
Maintainer: | lightdot |
Last Packager: | lightdot |
Votes: | 273 |
Popularity: | 1.87 |
First Submitted: | 2016-04-21 08:45 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-01-04 04:03 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- kmod (busybox-coreutilsAUR, kmod-gitAUR)
- linux
- zfs-utilsAUR (zfs-linux-gitAUR, zfs-utils-staging-gitAUR, zfs-utils-gitAUR)
- linux-headers (make)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 79 Next › Last »
yaogen commented on 2020-02-28 21:41 (UTC)
A fix to the 5.5 build issues has been merged. Updates should hopefully be coming soon. https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/9745#issuecomment-592617605
francoism90 commented on 2020-02-06 09:51 (UTC)
@minextu Thanks for blocking Linux 5.5 and posting the upstream link. :)
To my understanding, even building the kernel with the patch, it may cause issues later on because it wasn't tested with Linux 5.5? Switching to
linux-lts
isn't a solution for everyone as it may cause other issues (AMD Zen2, Intel, etc.), unless things have been backported.pasque commented on 2020-02-05 19:22 (UTC)
@minextu your PKGBUILD file still says linux 5.5.1.arch1-1 is a dependancy. Should it be linux 5.4.15.arch1-1 since ZFS is broken on 5.5?
minextu commented on 2020-02-05 00:09 (UTC) (edited on 2020-02-29 14:54 (UTC) by minextu)
ZFS is broken on linux 5.5 right now, so this won't build. For more information see https://github.com/archzfs/archzfs/issues/328
Edit: A patch has been implemented
minextu commented on 2020-01-27 18:32 (UTC)
@francoism90 using the repo definitely makes it easier to upgrade. If you want faster updates you can try the
archzfs-testing
repo. It automatically updates once per day but it's untested. That said, I didn't have any issues so far and I'm actually thinking about using the testing repository as the main one at some point.francoism90 commented on 2020-01-27 08:43 (UTC) (edited on 2020-01-27 08:46 (UTC) by francoism90)
@minextu Should one use the repo instead when using
linux
as kernel?However it doesn't always sync with the latest version in
core
:https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories#archzfs
ipickering commented on 2020-01-26 17:47 (UTC)
@minextu Thanks, this worked for me.
minextu commented on 2020-01-26 05:28 (UTC)
@ipickering I don't maintain the aur version of zfs-utils, so I don't have any control over this. You can use this PKGBUILD in the meantime: https://github.com/archzfs/zfs-utils
ipickering commented on 2020-01-26 02:28 (UTC)
I can no longer install this package, because it requires zfs-utils 0.8.3, but only 0.8.2-2 is in the AUR. Normally I uninstalled zfs-linux to get around the fact that I can't do pacman -Syu because of the kernel dependency but this leaves me stuck without ZFS. Will zfs-utils be updated soon?
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 79 Next › Last »