Package Details: zfs-linux-headers 2.3.4_6.16.7.arch1.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/zfs-linux.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: zfs-linux
Description: Kernel headers for the Zettabyte File System.
Upstream URL: https://openzfs.org/
Keywords: kernel linux openzfs zfs
Licenses: CDDL
Conflicts: spl-dkms, spl-dkms-git, spl-headers, zfs-dkms, zfs-dkms-git, zfs-dkms-rc, zfs-headers
Provides: spl-headers, zfs-headers
Submitter: demizer
Maintainer: lightdot
Last Packager: lightdot
Votes: 276
Popularity: 0.107674
First Submitted: 2016-04-21 08:45 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-09-12 16:18 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

lightdot commented on 2025-02-04 21:19 (UTC) (edited on 2025-08-27 08:58 (UTC) by lightdot)

This package will be kept in sync with the latest openzfs stable release and the kernels officially supported by it.

For the supported kernel versions, refer to the respective openzfs release notes (LINK).

E.g., openzfs 2.3.4 supports kernel versions 4.18 - 6.16. When kernel 6.17 is released for Arch, zfs-linux will not be updated until the openzfs project announces that it's compatible. This will most likely happen with the next openzfs release.

Kernel compatibility of the upcoming openzfs release can be seen in their META file (LINK).

For those wishing to use openzfs with unsupported kernels, do note that this can lead to serious issues, including data loss, even though such a zfs-linux package might build and install cleanly. Have reliable backups and use such a package at your peril.

Please do not mark this package as out of date without checking the kernel compatibility first. Thank you!

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 .. 80 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2014-11-07 12:45 (UTC)

Rather than polluting the AUR page for this package, can I ask users to post in the following thread with their observations of zfs-git under linux-3.17.2-1? Are there truly stability or data integrety issues or just a few isolated cases. Again, do not reply here in the AUR. Thanks all! https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1473409

justinkb commented on 2014-11-06 10:17 (UTC)

Interesting thread. I don't use zvols but that log does look similar. Some strange goings-on... Think I'll roll back to a more stable kernel, see if that fixes things. Hope I don't run into any backward compatibility problems moving from zfs-git to zfs-lts packages...

kerberizer commented on 2014-11-05 10:49 (UTC)

@justinkb, any chance that you're using ZVOLs? You might want to see this... https://groups.google.com/a/zfsonlinux.org/forum/#!topic/zfs-discuss/GZcKqUjvuPM

justinkb commented on 2014-11-04 22:44 (UTC)

Relevant lines from kernel log here http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=GqYNnqfw

demizer commented on 2014-11-04 22:31 (UTC)

@justinkb, I'm am using the git packages and don't see any problems. If you could post the exact error message that would be helpful.

justinkb commented on 2014-11-04 22:18 (UTC)

Getting big lockup problems nearly daily now with this. Kernel log full of mutex timeouts or something like that. Anyone else?

timemaster commented on 2014-10-26 02:32 (UTC)

Since the last update, doing a zpool status show status: Some supported features are not enabled on the pool. The pool can still be used, but some features are unavailable. action: Enable all features using 'zpool upgrade'. Once this is done, .... .. I am not sure if it's just a new detection that warns me of available features not activated. Indeed, if I inspect (without upgrading) my features flag with "zpool upgrade", I can see many missing from the "man zpool-features" list.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 .. 80 Next › Last »