Package Details: znc-clientbuffer-git r35.d55a108-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/znc-clientbuffer-git.git (read-only)
Package Base: znc-clientbuffer-git
Description: ZNC module for client specific buffers
Upstream URL: https://github.com/CyberShadow/znc-clientbuffer
Licenses: Apache
Submitter: arcnmx
Maintainer: arcnmx
Last Packager: arcnmx
Votes: 0
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2016-08-11 18:08
Last Updated: 2017-10-10 15:34

Dependencies (1)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

arcnmx commented on 2017-10-10 15:38

Updated to use the newer fork. If CyberShadow wants to comment here requesting that I transfer ownership I can do that (is that even a thing or do I just disown it?)

aphirst commented on 2017-10-10 06:58

It seems that CyberShadow's repo is now actually considered the "official" one.

https://github.com/CyberShadow/znc-clientbuffer
https://github.com/jpnurmi/znc-clientbuffer/issues/6#issuecomment-334988936

S13ntist commented on 2017-10-08 09:45

Apparently jpnurmi abandoned the project (or at least has been inactive for a long while now regarding this repo, on github and on irc)

CyberShadow did a fork, which is now also the repo mentioned on the znc-wiki (https://wiki.znc.in/Clientbuffer), in which they implemented lots of new functionality and improvements.

Would you mind updating the source origin?
The new repo would be https://github.com/CyberShadow/znc-clientbuffer

CyberShadow would also be interested to accept ownership of this package if you are so inclined, as he is also on Arch

arcnmx commented on 2017-09-06 22:11

Hm the wiki indicates in https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#arch that "any" would be incorrect. It's always been annoying how arch=() isn't scalable or really even useful... Eventually x86_64 was just added to everything and maybe many years from now arm will be too.

aphirst commented on 2017-09-06 21:51

Since it's possible to install this package on platforms other than just i686 and x86_64, indeed on any for which znc is available, could this possibly be reflected in the PKGBUILD? I have to keep adding armv7h to mine, or keep changing to 'any', which is starting to get frustrating, and I struggle to think I'm the only one.