Search Criteria
Package Details: zpaq 7.15-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/zpaq.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | zpaq |
Description: | Programmable file compressor, library and utilities. Based on the PAQ compression algorithm |
Upstream URL: | http://mattmahoney.net/dc/zpaq.html |
Licenses: | custom, MIT |
Submitter: | Ereski |
Maintainer: | Ereski |
Last Packager: | Ereski |
Votes: | 58 |
Popularity: | 0.91 |
First Submitted: | 2015-08-15 15:07 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-09-05 18:17 (UTC) |
Required by (5)
- peazip-gtk2-bin (optional)
- peazip-qt-bin (optional)
- peazip-qt5 (optional)
- steal-git
- zpipe
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
fcorbelli commented on 2023-09-14 12:42 (UTC)
Short version: I will put my AUR for zpaqfranz, different from zpaq's. Or at least I will try
Ereski commented on 2023-09-14 12:34 (UTC)
@fcorbelli anyone can create AUR packages, see here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines. Since you literally are the creator of zpaqfranz I don't see how it could ever be "rude" for you to maintain your AUR package for zpaqfranz. Feel free to use the PKGBUILD here as a starting point.
But as I understand you'd like to make this package switch to your fork? Your phrasing is a bit confusing but if that is indeed the case then the answer is no.
fcorbelli commented on 2023-09-14 12:01 (UTC)
@FabioLolix I know, it's my thread, but the question is a little different. Making an "official" package (for pacman) seems very difficult, while one for AUR much simpler (materially they are identical, but on AUR there is self-production) So I was asking if it is considered rude in the arch community to appropriate a AUR PKGBUILD to make your own
FabioLolix commented on 2023-09-12 17:41 (UTC)
@fcorbelli pkgbuild for zpaqfranz was discussed here with you https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2029754#p2029754
fcorbelli commented on 2023-09-12 17:28 (UTC)
I am not a frequent user, I would like to avoid gaffes, so I will ask a beginner question.
Is it possible to clone the zpaq package to update it with zpaqfranz?
Ereski commented on 2023-09-05 18:21 (UTC)
@MBK Thanks for finding the issue. ZPAQ builds fine with LTO and I've updated the package to allow this.
MBK commented on 2023-09-05 17:44 (UTC)
If you have LTO disabled as system default, the build fails with: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find auto: File or Path not found. /usr/bin/ld: cannot find auto: File or Path not found. collect2: Error: ld returned 1
Adding "options=(!lto)" to the PKGBUILD fixes the problem.
tjhexf commented on 2023-07-31 12:14 (UTC)
same issue reported by @lunainvictum in my system. does not build
Ereski commented on 2023-03-01 10:46 (UTC)
@lunainvictum builds just fine here both with current clang (v15.0.7) and current gcc (v12.2.1). Looks like your env vars may not be set up correctly
lunainvictum commented on 2023-03-01 10:27 (UTC)
Build fails with:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find auto: File or Path not found. /usr/bin/ld: cannot find auto: File or Path not found. collect2: Error: ld returned 1
1 2 Next › Last »