I'm trying to build nvidia-pf, but it complains about "determining the kernel version".
The nvidia-pf PKGBUILD points the nvidia installer to "/lib/modules/2.6.37-pf/build" witch doesn't exist.
The stock arch kernel instead, contains "/lib/modules/2.6.36-ARCH/build" as a link to "/usr/src/2.6.36-ARCH/".
Should i create that link manually? Or did i messed up something during the kernel configuration?
Search Criteria
Package Base Details: linux-pf
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-pf.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Keywords: | bbr bbr3 kernel ksm linux linux-pf pf-kernel uksm uksmd v4l2loopback zstd |
Submitter: | nous |
Maintainer: | post-factum |
Last Packager: | post-factum |
Votes: | 210 |
Popularity: | 0.32 |
First Submitted: | 2011-07-24 12:01 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-05-06 10:23 (UTC) |
Packages (2)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 .. 106 Next › Last »
Cape commented on 2011-01-11 20:18 (UTC)
nous commented on 2011-01-10 10:10 (UTC)
To all users of kernel26-pf: I had an oversight in the .37 PKGBUILD that left inside the firmware files, so if pacman complained about conflicting files in /lib/firmware during the installation, please delete the kernel26-pf package from /var/cache/pacman/packages (if you used the prebuilt repo package), uninstall and re-install both kernel26-pf and linux-firmware so you don't have any conflicting files in future updates.
nous commented on 2011-01-08 17:00 (UTC)
For those who don't tweak much their kernels or are bored of compiling, assorted kernel26-packages can be found at the repo below.
[pfkernel]
# kernel26-pf, kernel26-pf-p3, kernel26-pf-k8, kernel26-pf-core2, nvidia-pf, squid3, arora-git
Server = http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11734958/$arch
nous commented on 2011-01-08 16:27 (UTC)
I've built successfully the generic x86_64 version (check the pfkernel repo: search for unofficial user repositories in archwiki) and I'm building right now the optimized 64-bit ones and the generic i686 version without errors. Wrapper scripts like yaourt are known to have problems with the AUR; please use 'aurdownload kernel26-pf' from aurscripts and just 'makepkg -i' inside the kernel26-pf directory.
<deleted-account> commented on 2011-01-08 15:46 (UTC)
Doesn't build for me:
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
HOSTCC scripts/basic/docproc
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/kxgettext.o
SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c
SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/lex.zconf.c
SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.hash.c
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o
HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
scripts/kconfig/conf --silentoldconfig Kconfig
fs/Kconfig:194: can't open file "fs/aufs/Kconfig"
make[2]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 1
make[1]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 2
make: *** No rule to make target `include/config/auto.conf', needed by `include/config/kernel.release'. Stop.
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build kernel26-pf.
==> Restart building kernel26-pf ? [y/N]
==> ------------------------------------
==>
==> WARNING: Following packages have not been installed:
kernel26-pf
This could be the problem:
==> Applying pf-kernel patch
bzip2: skipping "/tmp/yaourt-tmp-root/aur-kernel26-pf/src/patch-2.6.37-pf2.bz2": not a regular file
==> Applying aufs2 and squashfs-lzma patches
patching file fs/namei.c
patching file fs/splice.c
patching file include/linux/namei.h
patching file include/linux/splice.h
patching file fs/Kconfig
patching file fs/Makefile
patching file include/linux/Kbuild
patching file fs/file_table.c
patching file fs/inode.c
patching file fs/namei.c
patching file fs/namespace.c
patching file fs/notify/group.c
patching file fs/notify/mark.c
patching file fs/open.c
patching file fs/splice.c
patching file security/commoncap.c
patching file security/device_cgroup.c
patching file security/security.c
bzip2: skipping "/tmp/yaourt-tmp-root/aur-kernel26-pf/src/aufs2.1-2010-12-20.patch.bz2": not a regular file
nous commented on 2011-01-08 10:24 (UTC)
LZO compression is implemented now into mainline kernel hibernation and it should be as fast as tuxonice, but I still like the latter's framebuffer interface.
post-factum commented on 2011-01-08 09:46 (UTC)
BTW, I've deactivated tuxonice for my laptop, because hibernation works better without it.
nous commented on 2011-01-08 08:28 (UTC)
Grrrrreat! I'd hate to lose tuxonice.
Pinned Comments
post-factum commented on 2023-09-25 20:30 (UTC)
Official binary builds for various x86_64 μ-arches are available here.
post-factum commented on 2023-09-25 20:20 (UTC)
pf-kernel
follows its own versioning scheme that doesn't depend on stable kernel releases versioning.X.Y.Z
package version here corresponds tovX.Y-pfZ
release in the source code repo.