Package Base Details: nvidia-340xx

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-340xx.git (read-only, click to copy)
Submitter: simonsmh
Maintainer: JerryXiao
Last Packager: JerryXiao
Votes: 70
Popularity: 0.21
First Submitted: 2019-06-07 10:29 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-03-17 06:41 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

JerryXiao commented on 2022-10-13 03:51 (UTC) (edited on 2022-10-14 02:44 (UTC) by JerryXiao)

For testing users, contributors: check out https://github.com/archlinux-jerry/nvidia-340xx
Warning: force push may happen to match the aur tree

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 55 Next › Last »

KrisKorn commented on 2022-10-13 23:54 (UTC)

@JerryXiao Yes is working!! I Try dkms version and is working so far with kernel 6.0

Thanks, you work is very appreciated.!!

lmh69 commented on 2022-10-13 18:36 (UTC) (edited on 2022-10-13 18:39 (UTC) by lmh69)

Hi @JerryXiao It works well here with the (standard/"no dkms" version). Checked with the standard 6.0.1 kernel and the system upgraded to the current packages. I tested with glxgears, an old opengl game, youtube videos, and vdpau using mplayer. Checked dmesg, journalctl and xorg.log. All seems ok.

JerryXiao commented on 2022-10-13 03:51 (UTC) (edited on 2022-10-14 02:44 (UTC) by JerryXiao)

For testing users, contributors: check out https://github.com/archlinux-jerry/nvidia-340xx
Warning: force push may happen to match the aur tree

Lostless commented on 2022-10-10 15:07 (UTC)

304.108 driver patch not working on 6.0.

nahno commented on 2022-09-18 09:31 (UTC)

Hi @freeartist, is all okay still valid for you and 5.19.9-arch1-1? Thanks (for me it does not work)

mauzil commented on 2022-09-18 07:56 (UTC)

Hi all. Does the DRI3 extensions are supported with nvidia 340?

Thanks all

MZ

freeartist commented on 2022-09-07 22:19 (UTC) (edited on 2022-09-07 22:20 (UTC) by freeartist)

All ok, 340.108 driver patch 5.18 works on 5.19 kernel

[deepforest@home ~]$ grep "X Driver" /var/log/Xorg.0.log

[ 30.444] (II) NVIDIA dlloader X Driver 340.108 Wed Dec 11 14:06:00 PST 2019

[deepforest@home ~]$ uname -r

5.19.7-arch1-1

freeartist commented on 2022-09-06 21:42 (UTC)

Hello! Can i ask here? Will there be a patch for 5.19 kernel for this 340.108 driver?

sebalis commented on 2022-08-24 17:49 (UTC)

Apologies, I didn’t check thoroughly enough when I said that v4l2loopback-dkms does not seem to be affected – it is. The module is not loaded with a message saying “Invalid argument” and the journal says “kernel: failed to validate module [v4l2loopback] BTF: -22”, So in all likelihood that module has the same issue.

sebalis commented on 2022-08-24 12:56 (UTC) (edited on 2022-08-24 12:57 (UTC) by sebalis)

Reading the details in the linked-to reddit thread I think you’re spot on. I have seen the “Operation not permitted” message when trying to load the module manually and the update did include GCC. I have one other dkms module, v4l2loopback-dkms, which does not seem affected – maybe it does not use BTF/BPF in its source. (I don’t actually know what BTF/BPF is.)

What is to be done then – apply something like that reddit script to strip those BTF sections from the object files?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 55 Next › Last »