Package Base Details: wps-office

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/wps-office.git (read-only, click to copy)
Submitter: felixonmars
Maintainer: Universebenzene
Last Packager: Universebenzene
Votes: 489
Popularity: 2.47
First Submitted: 2014-08-17 11:57 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-02-22 03:20 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

Universebenzene commented on 2023-01-20 10:34 (UTC)

Anyone who meet the problem of launching wpspdf, please install the optional dependency libtiff5

Universebenzene commented on 2020-10-22 02:25 (UTC)

If you have the "ERROR: One or more files failed the validity check!" problem, try cleaning your AUR cache first, and try again.

Universebenzene commented on 2020-01-10 04:48 (UTC) (edited on 2020-06-09 15:38 (UTC) by Universebenzene)

[ATTENTION] The new international version (11.1.0.9080) removed zh_CN support, login, and some other functions. If you still want full functions, or you want aarch64 support, you may need the Chinese version from https://linux.wps.cn here: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wps-office-cn

Universebenzene commented on 2019-10-26 05:46 (UTC) (edited on 2019-10-26 07:10 (UTC) by Universebenzene)

I split the /usr/share/mime/packages/wps-office-*.xml files to the wps-office-mime package to avoid mime issues. If you still want the mime files provided by wps-office itself, you can install the new mime package.

Universebenzene commented on 2019-07-05 17:08 (UTC)

There is no official 32-bit package for version 11.1.0.8722, so I drop the support for i686 arch. For archlinux32 users you can create another wps-office package for 32-bit system yourself.

Universebenzene commented on 2019-04-16 13:34 (UTC)

When you shut down wps-office, the wpsoffice process may still exist. You can do sudo chmod -x /usr/lib/office6/wpsoffice to fix it. But this might bring you problem with signing in.

oowl commented on 2017-11-29 14:16 (UTC)

About the software issues, you can go to the official feedback problem. I'm just a packager, I can not solve the software problem.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 .. 69 Next › Last »

kgcf2011 commented on 2013-09-02 13:10 (UTC)

64位 gnome3.8不能用原生对话框吗?

felixonmars commented on 2013-08-06 09:21 (UTC)

9.1.0.4127~a11p3

shmilee commented on 2013-08-02 13:31 (UTC)

http://wps-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=66 After Kingsoft-office available for the 'x86_64' architecture, wpsoffice should have arch=('i686' 'x86_64').

felixonmars commented on 2013-07-23 12:59 (UTC)

9.1.0.4111~a11p2

timxx commented on 2013-07-12 09:45 (UTC)

There is a new patch version (9.1.0.4096)

JoveYu commented on 2013-07-11 14:24 (UTC)

so do you notice the '#' for the comment ? and if you are not a chinese ,maybe you needn't those fonts!

m13253 commented on 2013-07-11 14:15 (UTC)

Why do you delete the fonts files? I don't think they have copyright issues distributing with kingsoft-office package.

qpalz commented on 2013-07-08 12:55 (UTC)

Well... I am faked... Both of them are the same... There are no difference between i386.deb and i686.rpm...

qpalz commented on 2013-07-08 12:20 (UTC)

Why not use http://wdl.cache.ijinshan.com/wps/download/Linux/unstable/kingsoft-office-9.1.0.4032-0.1.a10.i686.rpm?

Diego commented on 2013-07-05 09:48 (UTC)

Please translate the PKGBUILD in English