Package Details: linux-ck 6.11.10-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.22
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (7)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 .. 308 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2014-08-25 00:24 (UTC)

Bump to v3.16.1-2 Changelog: Update to ck2 with bfs v456 and fix FS#41683 (intel ringbuffer). Commit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog

AnAkkk commented on 2014-08-20 15:51 (UTC)

According to the kernel config, 1000 Hz is best for desktop systems anyway, so it might be better to just leave it like that. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/Kconfig.hz?id=refs/tags/v3.17-rc1

graysky commented on 2014-08-18 12:18 (UTC)

I haven't checked running at 300 Hz. If you would like to try and report back that would be great. AFAIK ck recommends 1000 Hz.

AnAkkk commented on 2014-08-18 10:48 (UTC)

Haven't the suspend issues been solved since a long time now? 1000 Hz should no longer be required? Aren't there some downsides from using 1000Hz instead of 300Hz?

dkaylor commented on 2014-08-16 18:22 (UTC)

OK. As always, thanks for the work you do on linux-ck, been using it for years now.

graysky commented on 2014-08-16 18:14 (UTC)

No idea about the answer to your SMT question. I just use modprobed-db on my own system and disable a few things that I don't use, NUMA, virtualization, and hibernation.

dkaylor commented on 2014-08-16 18:12 (UTC)

Thanks graysky. Which leads me to a question - SMT nice aside, if I have a non-SMT processor (4 cores = 4 threads, nice and simple) does disabling SMT in the kernel config accomplish anything, other than saving a little overhead? What's your opinion on heavily customized kernel configs in general?

graysky commented on 2014-08-16 17:55 (UTC)

No, I thought about this... it's currently on (ie hardcoded in the .config files). You will need to manually disable it. I could add this to the PKGBUILD as an option, but have no idea how many users would even use it.

dkaylor commented on 2014-08-16 17:53 (UTC)

so as bfs 450 now includes the smt nice work, will I be able to turn it off in the kernel config? I have a non-hyperthreaded core2 quad, so I always turn off SMT scheduling, although I'm not sure it matters much. ck mentions a bfs450-nosmt-buildfix.patch to make it impossible to enable SMT nice on a non-SMT kernel, but not sure it's included in the PKGBUILD. I'm fine with just disabling it in the config.

graysky commented on 2014-08-16 10:09 (UTC)

Bump to v3.16.1-1 Changelog: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.16.1 Commit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 .. 308 Next › Last »