Package Details: linux-ck 6.11.10-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.22
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (7)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 .. 308 Next › Last »

ilkyest commented on 2014-08-04 01:51 (UTC)

Graysky... patch from con kolivas, resulting in timeout -> patch-3.15-ck1.bz2...

ilkyest commented on 2014-08-04 01:40 (UTC)

Thanks so much by the kernel Graysky. I'm a folding at home user (http://folding.stanford.edu/), that try improves F@H performance, every time trying new kernels. Sometime ago, about 3.10.1 your kernel was not good to folding. At this time, only in one test, it were the worst, I'm trying NUMA=ON and NUMA=OFF differences, and, withing your changes, and "kernel's studying" in a while, only ck will fold on my pc. But... when you will bump the pkgver? Any date?

graysky commented on 2014-08-01 13:42 (UTC)

Note that CK just posted an experimental patch that in his words, "Works for me flawlessly on all my stuff, but it's still pretty new." You can read about it at the link below. I don't want to enable it by default in the repo but do want to allow users a chance to try it out in the PKGBUILD. See the first set of comments to enable it. As always, post your experiences both good and bad to CK's blog so he can make ck1 and BFS more and more powerful and robust for everyone to enjoy. Note-I am not going to bump the pkgver to 2 since I just rebuild the repo overnight and since this is really no chance unless you enable it. http://ck-hack.blogspot.com/2014/08/smthyperthreading-nice-and-scheduling.html

graysky commented on 2014-08-01 02:36 (UTC)

Bump to v3.15.8-1 Changelog: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.15.8 Commit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog

graysky commented on 2014-07-30 19:22 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw them and in the past CK has considered the patch experimental and as noted in his blog post, "this patch by itself does nothing unless other code uses the locks." I don't want to add an experimental patch to the package must less to repo packages people depend on for stable systems.

clfarron4 commented on 2014-07-30 19:10 (UTC)

I assume the flagger saw a new post on the CK blog and flagged out-of-date without reading. That said, the new post on the CK blog refers to these patches: http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/bfs/3.0/3.15/urwlocks/urw-locks.patch http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/bfs/3.0/3.15/urwlocks/bfs449-grq_urwlocks.patch Just after I build 3.15.7-1-ck-pax as well (with no time left today or tomorrow to muse over these new patches).

graysky commented on 2014-07-28 20:07 (UTC)

Bump to v3.15.7-1 Changelog: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.15.7 Commit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog

clfarron4 commented on 2014-07-25 11:45 (UTC)

And algo.ing.unimo.it is back up again.