Package Details: linux-ck 6.11.8-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.25
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-15 22:31 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (6)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 .. 307 Next › Last »

Naypam commented on 2011-12-16 14:25 (UTC)

I wonder if you would consider adding a _make_menuconfig option to the top options that does a menuconfig after setting up the kernel modules with modprobed_db and that? It's mainly a convenience thing, unless there's a reason not to do so! Saves me 30 seconds every time I want to upgrade because I don't have to alter the PKGBUILD!

graysky commented on 2011-12-10 01:26 (UTC)

Bump to v3.1.5-2 Change log: I neglected to change the pkgver in linux-ck.install in the 3.1.5-1 release :( Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur.git/commit/linux-ck?id=474fc834e27691b131f7f174b2aff6c036204587

graysky commented on 2011-12-09 20:36 (UTC)

Bump to v3.1.5-1 Change log: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/9/267 Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur.git/commit/linux-ck?id=29a78572e8afe36f466e127e29837c6c6cf442a4

graysky commented on 2011-11-30 00:55 (UTC)

Bump to v3.1.4-1 Change log: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/28/563 http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur.git/commit/linux-ck?id=b2f7e30053c3ce2ceca37ce6b0aec97a5f01e1d5

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-11-28 22:41 (UTC)

Sorry guys my bad, I should of only been posting here for Arch related matters...

graysky commented on 2011-11-28 12:30 (UTC)

rm -rf src pkg && makepkg -src

fackamato commented on 2011-11-28 11:11 (UTC)

Hm, looks like the patches don't apply cleanly no more? ==> Patching source with the ck2 patch set using bfs v0.415 patching file arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c The next patch would create the file Documentation/scheduler/sched-BFS.txt, which already exists! Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored patching file Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt patching file fs/proc/base.c patching file include/linux/init_task.h patching file include/linux/ioprio.h patching file include/linux/sched.h patching file init/Kconfig patching file init/main.c patching file kernel/delayacct.c patching file kernel/exit.c patching file kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c The next patch would create the file kernel/sched_bfs.c, which already exists! Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored patching file kernel/sched.c patching file kernel/sysctl.c patching file lib/Kconfig.debug patching file include/linux/jiffies.h patching file drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c patching file mm/vmscan.c patching file include/linux/swap.h patching file mm/memory.c patching file mm/swapfile.c patching file include/linux/mmzone.h patching file include/linux/mm_inline.h patching file mm/filemap.c patching file mm/swap.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 371 (offset 23 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 395 (offset 23 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 406 (offset 23 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 698 (offset 23 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 727 (offset 23 lines). patching file mm/readahead.c patching file include/linux/pagemap.h patching file mm/page-writeback.c patching file arch/x86/Kconfig patching file kernel/Kconfig.hz patching file arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c patching file arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c patching file include/linux/nfsd/stats.h patching file include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h patching file init/calibrate.c patching file kernel/Kconfig.preempt patching file drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c patching file drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c patching file Makefile ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... mburen@mburen:~/abs/linux-ck$

Zom commented on 2011-11-28 07:25 (UTC)

@DasFox: ck-hack isn't grayskys blog, neither is graysky who made these patches. The PKGBUILD outlines what's done with the patches. Either try for yourself or look at the readmes for the different patches. If you absolutely need to ask graysky questions unrelated to this package or arch, then I think it'd be nice if you could do so by email instead of by comments on this package.