AUR (en) - android-apktool

Search Criteria

Package Details: android-apktool 2.9.3-1

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/android-apktool.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	android-apktool
Description:	a tool for reengineering Android apk files
Upstream URL:	https://github.com/iBotPeaches/Apktool
Licenses:	Apache-2.0
Submitter:	TamCore
Maintainer:	Muflone
Last Packager:	Muflone
Votes:	240
Popularity:	0.176374
First Submitted:	2010-10-25 15:09 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2024-02-06 01:08 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aur.archlinux.org/android-apktool.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

android-apktool

Description:

a tool for reengineering Android apk files

Upstream URL:

https://github.com/iBotPeaches/Apktool

Licenses:

Apache-2.0

Submitter:

TamCore

Maintainer:

Muflone

Last Packager:

Muflone

Votes:

240

Popularity:

0.176374

First Submitted:

2010-10-25 15:09 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2024-02-06 01:08 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last »

a172 commented on 2014-02-20 22:09 (UTC)

:) good stuff. It is on the AUR as android-apktool-beta.

TamCore commented on 2014-02-19 20:16 (UTC)

@jumperpunk: Sorry, I meant android-apktool-beta :D

a172 commented on 2014-02-19 20:00 (UTC)

@TamCore: android-studio-beta or android-apktool-beta?

TamCore commented on 2014-02-19 19:44 (UTC)

@jumperpunk: In the current state you could name your package android-studio-beta. But as soon as we get a final 2.0.0 release, I'll update this package.

a172 commented on 2014-02-19 18:51 (UTC)

@TamCore: I built a PKGBUILD for 2.0.0b9. This depends on jre7. Should this be a separate package/AUR entry? If so, should the name be andoird-apktool2 or android-apktool-testing (or something else)? I want to make sure I'm following the right standards. http://pastebin.com/i0uJ46f9 Also, on a minor point, I believe the license should be "Apache", not "Apache 2.0", as version 2 is what is actually in /usr/share/licenses/common/Apache/license.txt @jz_train: lib32-zlib is listed as a dependency of android-sdk-build-tools. It should have been installed already.

jz_train commented on 2013-10-22 18:25 (UTC)

On arch x64 aapt will fail, 32-bit binary. You need to install lib32-zlib. Took me a while of searching. Figured I'd share if not already common knowledge.

westmin commented on 2013-07-27 20:02 (UTC)

have to change dependencies android-sdk-build-tools to android-sdk-build-tools-17

westmin commented on 2013-05-17 17:21 (UTC)

ok. u r right.

TamCore commented on 2013-05-17 17:09 (UTC)

apktool doesnt provide the functionality to sign apks and doesn't depend on these two programms, so I don't see a reason for adding more stuff as deps. Currect me if I'm wrong.

westmin commented on 2013-05-17 16:58 (UTC)

question 2 where is Keytool and Jarsigner? needed to sign apk. http://developer.android.com/tools/publishing/app-signing.html it says the tools is in JDK, so why you do not include JDK as depent?