Package Details: bitwig-studio 2.2.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/bitwig-studio.git (read-only)
Package Base: bitwig-studio
Description: Digital audio workstation for music production, remixing and live performance
Upstream URL: https://www.bitwig.com/
Keywords: audio daw multimedia music
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: bitwig-8-track, bitwig-studio-legacy
Provides: bitwig-studio
Submitter: stylemistake
Maintainer: stylemistake (mkzero)
Last Packager: stylemistake
Votes: 58
Popularity: 0.446646
First Submitted: 2016-03-28 16:43
Last Updated: 2017-10-28 13:26

Latest Comments

bsorahan commented on 2017-12-11 03:47

I've used this to install bitwig and it works fabulously (after installing jack2), so I'm thinking about buying a license. I was curious about what would happen when bitwig 3 comes out: hoping that "pacman -Syu" wouldn't put me back in demo mode! It looks like we should maybe expect a major version upgrade to require a different package or some other sort of manual intervention? Thanks for making this package!

blk commented on 2017-10-29 13:48

@liam1895 - "loading jack package: jack_get_version_string" - I had the same issue and fixed it with `sudo pacman -S jack2`.

`jack_get_version_string` seems to be present only in Jack2 (https://github.com/jackaudio/jackaudio.github.com/wiki/JackAPIchanges12#symbols-present-in-jack2-but-missing-in-jack1)

jonathon commented on 2017-03-03 15:37

It's working OK for me on two installs with jack2 (plus cadence-git).

liam1895 commented on 2017-03-02 06:52

Is there a missing package? When installing and trying to use jack audio in bitwig interface I keep getting the error "error loading jack package: jack_get_version_string"

stylemistake commented on 2017-03-01 01:01

Created bitwig-studio-legacy for those who are unhappy with licensing model of 2.0.

jonathon commented on 2017-03-01 00:02

Given the new licensing model would a bitwig-studio-legacy (or similar) package for 1.3.15 be a useful thing?

interferon commented on 2017-03-01 00:01

Greetings, I think that there should be two different packages for Bitwig 1.3 and Bitwig 2.0, since those with a license for Bitwig 1.3 who did not buy the upgrade can only use the demo version of Bitwig 2, so they will likely not want to upgrade.

chilango commented on 2017-02-28 22:21

Thanks for pushing the package for Bitwig 2.0 so quickly!

stylemistake commented on 2016-12-09 12:27

Created an automated script for incrementing this package version. Tell me if something breaks.

chilango commented on 2016-11-13 20:21

Nah don't sweat it, thanks for maintaining the package.

All comments