Maintainer -
Could you give your Brave packing duties to someone else when you are on vacation? Waiting another few more day when there are security bug is unacceptable. Do your job or give it to someone else who can!
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/brave-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | brave-bin |
Description: | Web browser that blocks ads and trackers by default (binary release) |
Upstream URL: | https://brave.com |
Keywords: | brave browser |
Licenses: | BSD, MPL2, custom:chromium |
Conflicts: | brave |
Provides: | brave, brave-browser |
Submitter: | toropisco |
Maintainer: | alerque (alosarjos) |
Last Packager: | alosarjos |
Votes: | 767 |
Popularity: | 14.31 |
First Submitted: | 2016-04-06 13:16 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-05-02 13:07 (UTC) |
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 56 Next › Last »
Maintainer -
Could you give your Brave packing duties to someone else when you are on vacation? Waiting another few more day when there are security bug is unacceptable. Do your job or give it to someone else who can!
I'm out of home for a few days. Will update once I return
Hello, the version Release v1.57.62 (Chromium 116.0.5845.180) is avaible on brave git. Is it possible to update the package please ?
Anyone else having an issues with not being able to switch between tabs? The tab highlights when I hover over it, but when I click the tab displayed does not change.
1.57.49 is an update only for Windows
@zagg Looks like a rollback waaaaay back before even I started with the package
Hello,
What is the reason behind "epoch" in the pkgbuild here ?
@wknapik Thanks for the info. But I'm not sure how should proceed with 2 sources defining the version for the same package (ARM64/X86_64).
As long as they are synced, no problem, but the moment one differs from the other it would trigger unnecessary updates for the other architecture...
Pinned Comments
alerque commented on 2021-11-27 03:11 (UTC)
@ant0n et all, lets keep the comments here about packaging issues, general Brave usage issues should go in another forum to not clutter up this comment space. I'm deleting comments that have no relation to packaging. Grey areas like crashes that could be blamed on Arch can stay until proven otherwise, but things like how to configure Brave to handle popups or site X or whatever just don't belong here. Thanks for understanding.