@xantares These are not actually mingw-w64 applications proper, but components of a Linux application that allows for discovering and loading Windows VSTs. Moving them to exotic (from the application’s point of view) locations might possibly break functionality – but I won’t even bother to go on a wild goose chase to see if it does or not. I’m not going to get into philosophical debates, either. If the scripts are unacceptable, then better have them removed.
Making guesses on what others would/had or would/had not rather do is not such a good practice as it inevitably yields unpredictable results. What I’d rather do is disown the packages or, better yet, file a removal request, as I’m not really tormented by any excruciating, irrepressible need to share with others in the first place, and continue to maintain them for my own personal needs in a way in which I can be sure they are usable – other users can manage on their own, this is Arch after all.
I’ve been maintaining these for nearly six years in order to bring unavailable Linux functionality to Arch, which was available in other distributions. The fact that I had to go through MinGW to achieve that was a major pain in the proverbial behind, but it was nothing as annoying as the struggle with bureaucracy. All things come to an end sooner or later – now is as good a time as any. While at it, I might as well ditch mingw-w64-liblo
, which I’ve been maintaining without either using or needing since it ceased to be a dependency of these bridges. I say give the world what the world wants and never look back.
Pinned Comments