Package Details: depot-tools-git r5113.4d2e8bff-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: depot-tools-git
Description: Build tools for working with Chromium development, include gclient
Upstream URL:
Keywords: blink chromium development google tools v8
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: depot_tools-svn, gclient-svn
Provides: depot_tools, gclient
Submitter: aperez
Maintainer: aperez (yan12125)
Last Packager: yan12125
Votes: 82
Popularity: 0.100019
First Submitted: 2014-07-07 14:25
Last Updated: 2018-05-25 08:29

Dependencies (5)

Sources (3)

Latest Comments

yan12125 commented on 2018-05-25 08:32

Your package depot-tools-git [1] has been flagged out-of-date by necklace [2]:

:: depot-tools-git package(s) failed to install.
:: ensure package version does not mismatch between .SRCINFO and PKGBUILD
:: ensure package name has a VCS suffix if this is a devel package

[1] <>
[2] <>

Thanks it should have been fixed!

yan12125 commented on 2017-10-03 09:22

Thanks @Hudd, should have been fixed.

Hudd commented on 2017-10-03 08:48

sed: can't read commit_queue: No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare().

yan12125 commented on 2017-07-31 07:05

Thanks. I bumped pkgver anyway as I wanna know if the latest version still works fine or not.

fightcookie commented on 2017-07-30 22:31

please change the upstream url to TLS encrypted https, but don't change the package version or rel for this, since it doesn't change the resulting package, just metadata.
Also change the link in the depot_tools.install file when you're at it.
thanks in advance :)

yan12125 commented on 2017-05-11 05:08

OK! I've pushed a commit that removed /etc/profile.d/ If that brings any problem to users, we can revert it.

aperez commented on 2017-05-10 15:07

Well, I do not use this myself much lately, but it was handy to have
the tools in the $PATH. That being said, I have no strong opinion about
whether a profile.d script should be installed or not.

As a matter of fact: if there's somebody interested in taking care of
this package, I'll happily pass it along to someone and/or them as
co-maintainers ;-)

yan12125 commented on 2017-04-08 16:13

Got it. Sometimes I feel my $PATH bloated, too :)

Maybe we can have a change, so that $PATH needs to be modified in .bashrc/.zshrc/etc... by users manually. How do you think, @aperez?

vasya commented on 2017-04-08 16:04

@yan12125 no particular reason except I do not need it at all. And the PATH in question has _125_ executables. A bit too much for me.

yan12125 commented on 2017-04-08 15:12

Just curious - any reason for keeping this package from touching /etc/profile.d?

All comments