Package Details: flatseal 2.3.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/flatseal.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: flatseal
Description: A permissions manager for Flatpak.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/tchx84/Flatseal/
Keywords: flatpak
Licenses: GPL-3.0-or-later
Submitter: whynothugo
Maintainer: C0rn3j
Last Packager: C0rn3j
Votes: 24
Popularity: 2.07
First Submitted: 2020-05-13 11:47 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-22 16:04 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »

prettyvanilla commented on 2022-09-07 13:59 (UTC)

libhandy is also a runtime dependency, without it installed I got Unsatisfied dependency: Handy. And I second the missing appstream-glib dependency.

jclds139 commented on 2022-09-05 15:51 (UTC) (edited on 2022-09-05 15:51 (UTC) by jclds139)

Seems to need appstream-glib to be installed in order to run. I'd suggest adding it to deps() directly.

whynothugo commented on 2022-08-17 08:28 (UTC)

That's a very reasonable idea. Can you ask upstream if they'll consider it?

If upstream can make the change themselves, it'll trickle down to us and other distros. If they're against it, I'll add it to package().

saltedcoffii commented on 2022-08-16 20:10 (UTC)

@whynothugo have you considered adding a line to the package() section that is or is something like ln -s com.github.tchx84.Flatseal /usr/bin/flatseal to make like easier for people who often launch binaries from the terminal?

Technetium1 commented on 2022-08-03 22:40 (UTC)

This is missing cmake and libhandy to build in clean chroot.

smk commented on 2022-03-13 21:37 (UTC)

Installing flatseal through flatpak apparently(?) would have required me to download an additional ~500MiB of GNOME libraries through flatpak which I already have on my system and do not need in flatpak, so I for one am grateful that this AUR package exists

whynothugo commented on 2022-02-01 16:01 (UTC)

I'm tempted to delete this package in favour of the flatpak one. Given that this is a tool to configure FLATPAK overrides, I can't imagine someone wanting to use it, but being against using flatpak.

Any objections?

whynothugo commented on 2022-01-28 10:13 (UTC)

I have the native package installed, and run it with firejail, mostly as an experiment to see if I can prevent Flatseal from escalating its own permissions.

This hasn't been great so far; the latest version breaks with firejail.

abouvier commented on 2022-01-25 15:52 (UTC)

Are you using your own package or the flatpak version? :p

whynothugo commented on 2022-01-06 14:47 (UTC)

What error do you see without webkit2gtk? I added it to dependencies, but I've now noticed it's not installed on my system, and com.github.tchx84.Flatseal works fine.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »