Package Details: google-chrome 76.0.3809.100-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: google-chrome
Description: The popular and trusted web browser by Google (Stable Channel)
Upstream URL:
Keywords: chromium
Licenses: custom:chrome
Submitter: None
Maintainer: luzifer
Last Packager: luzifer
Votes: 1829
Popularity: 12.514781
First Submitted: 2010-05-25 20:25
Last Updated: 2019-08-06 21:10

Dependencies (13)

Required by (25)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

Det commented on 2017-10-01 00:35

The final vote. “What should be the pkgdesc of AUR/google-chrome?” With 82 votes:

● "One fast, simple, and secure browser for all your devices (Stable Channel)" - 17 votes (21%)
● "The popular and trusted web browser by Google (Stable Channel)" - 65 votes (79%)

Now, my deciding vote of 49 votes will be cast and the winner is...
, I’m kidding, I’m kidding. Pkgdesc changed. ^^

Det commented on 2016-03-09 05:01

✔ NOTE. If the sha512sums don't match, there's a new version. Simply flag the package.

You can check for new Linux releases in:, or use:

$ curl -sL | gzip -df | tr ' ' '\n' | grep -e name= -e ver= | cut -d '"' -f2 | sed 'N;s/\n/ /'

For new MD5: $ curl -sL | sed -n '35p'

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

kraftwerk28 commented on 2019-08-08 22:08

@yuu to enable dark mode just pass --force-dark-mode flag to the app

Det commented on 2019-07-16 10:44

@TimOverboard, "trusted", because back when I maintained this thing the description used to be "An attempt at a faster, safer, more stable browser". Or something. Only so that the product would always stand on its own merit. Just, after a while people wanted change, so I made a poll and what-do-you-know this description won (see the very first pinned comment) :) (on top of which Chrome's got like 60% global usage share).

Either way, can't really see anything "inflammatory" about that, bro, nor does it somehow stigmatize luzifer as a troll to stick by a choice the majority decided on.

TimOverboard commented on 2019-07-16 10:26

Description: The popular and trusted web browser by Google

The word trusted is unneccesary, subjective, promoting and inflammatory. Why would you state this as a fact? You are troll, yes? I sincerely hope so because the alternatives actually ruin my day.

I don't care how much longer you've been using arch and/or Linux than me.. just sort this out will you. It's grossly offensive to see it in my AUR search results.

JohnML commented on 2019-07-16 09:38

just updated my google-chrome to:

Google itself tells me: Version 75.0.3770.100 (Offizieller Build) (64-Bit)

but yay tells me it installed ok: google-chrome-75.0.3770.142-1

i used yay -Su

Google works ok, but are these two version different??

info: CPU: Quad Core Intel Core i5-6400 (-MCP-) speed/min/max: 800/800/3300 MHz Kernel: 5.1.16-1-MANJARO x86_64 Up: 26m Mem: 4018.2/15986.4 MiB (25.1%) Storage: 3.18 TiB (11.3% used) Procs: 234 Shell: bash 5.0.7 inxi: 3.0.34

Pamac refused to install: database locked

yuu commented on 2019-07-16 00:06

How to enable dark mode? I'm using Arch Linux and KDE plasma. GTK "Prefer Dark theme" is enabled but my google chrome still not in dark mode.

I've installed dark theme but I want dark mode. Address bar still white.

Help me. lol

jpvaldez26 commented on 2019-07-05 01:08

Flash not present on Chrome-Browser-Stable.

jessicaann commented on 2019-05-31 06:30

well it's not some kind that leads the way but Google chrome keep on to extend new cool features and performance tweaks to make it even work more better and It was real stunner when I opened up with this URL in my chrome browser

donaldspangler20 commented on 2019-05-22 09:05

Why is it weird that Chromium is still working with flash while Chrome doesn't?

bianjp commented on 2019-05-17 02:02

The flash bug has been accepted by Chromium:

By the way, it's quite strange that Chromium still works with flash while Chrome does not.

imwxz commented on 2019-05-12 15:54

+1 flash not work. Temporary solution is to use

google-chrome-stable --no-sandbox

But you may get an ugly warning and may be not safe?