Package Details: google-chrome-dev 85.0.4183.15-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: google-chrome-dev
Description: The popular and trusted web browser by Google (Dev Channel)
Upstream URL:
Keywords: chromium
Licenses: custom:chrome
Provides: google-chrome
Submitter: None
Maintainer: luzifer
Last Packager: luzifer
Votes: 635
Popularity: 1.81
First Submitted: 2009-06-05 21:02
Last Updated: 2020-07-08 20:53

Dependencies (14)

Required by (38)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

Det commented on 2016-03-09 05:02

✔ NOTE. If the sha512sums don't match, there's a new version. Simply flag the package.

You can check for new Linux releases in:, or use:

$ curl -sL | gzip -df | tr ' ' '\n' | grep -e name= -e ver= | cut -d '"' -f2 | sed 'N;s/\n/ /'

For new MD5: $ curl -sL | sed -n '54p'

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... Next › Last »

jevonearth commented on 2015-05-21 18:51

Appears that the checksums for google-chrome-unstable_44.0.2403.4_amd64.deb do not match the PKGBUILD.

324e766a06d6c2044822d8595eff1c1f google-chrome-unstable_44.0.2403.4_amd64.deb

Det commented on 2015-05-20 05:28

ruario, are you still subscribed to this comment section? You are from Norway, and have over 2000 posts in Linux Questions?:

Det commented on 2015-05-06 08:13

I don't agree with you.

mischka commented on 2015-04-22 07:52

md5sum fails for the deb on amd64

munyamunya commented on 2015-04-17 10:51

44.0.2369.0-1 still does not load tabs from previous session until selected, but atleast it shows their icons. Rejoice!

jugs commented on 2015-04-16 23:43

@GreenRacoon23, I still need to force the scaling factor to 1 otherwise it's comically large.

GreenRaccoon23 commented on 2015-04-14 22:47

@jugs It works fine for me, but I'm also running a moderately fast computer. The only bug I have is that the panel icon doesn't show up, even though the icons and .desktop files seem to be set up correctly in the file system.

jvybihal commented on 2015-04-13 10:15

Yes, with the modifications described below. But i personaly feel, that chrome is not performing as good as it was before.

jugs commented on 2015-04-13 10:11

Has anyone got this giant browser working properly with XFCE?

GreenRaccoon23 commented on 2015-04-11 22:50

(Thanks for that lifesaver hendry.)
The newest version (as of 2015-04-11) does not need the options that hendry posted.