Package Details: google-chrome-dev 133.0.6888.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/google-chrome-dev.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: google-chrome-dev
Description: The popular web browser by Google (Dev Channel)
Upstream URL: https://www.google.com/chrome
Keywords: chromium
Licenses: custom:chrome
Provides: google-chrome
Submitter: None
Maintainer: gromit
Last Packager: gromit
Votes: 654
Popularity: 1.02
First Submitted: 2009-06-05 21:02 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-12 16:49 (UTC)

Dependencies (12)

Required by (41)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

gromit commented on 2023-07-19 17:01 (UTC) (edited on 2023-07-19 17:02 (UTC) by gromit)

When reporting this package as outdated make sure there is indeed a new version for Linux Desktop. You can have a look at the "Dev updates" tag in Release blog for this.

You can also run this command to obtain the version string for the latest chrome version:

$ curl -sSf https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/main/binary-amd64/Packages | \
     grep -A1 "Package: google-chrome-unstable" | \
     awk '/Version/{print $2}' | \
     cut -d '-' -f1

Do not report updates for ChromeOS, Android or other platforms stable versions as updates here.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 .. 91 Next › Last »

jnbek commented on 2013-03-04 17:51 (UTC)

@ Wilberfan, I know right?

wilberfan commented on 2013-03-03 00:34 (UTC)

Boy, as a complete noob to applying patches, It'd sure be helpful to see someone elses (working) PKGBUILD... I've been studying the Wiki...but a working reference file would make an excellent study guide! :-D

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-03-02 07:28 (UTC)

Here is a quick patch for your PKGBUILD for the Problem described from @tuftedocelot, @riccierim, @rickeyski and me ;-) https://gist.github.com/jk779/5070051

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-03-02 06:54 (UTC)

I'm just curious, is this dev-Version of Chrome as safe as the stable, concernining security? Does -dev get the same security-patches than -stable for example? Anything else to mention? (Except that a dev version is not bug-free ;-)

Det commented on 2013-03-01 11:13 (UTC)

"Shameless" :D. Are you kidding me? E: Oh yeah, you meant as in the fix you borrowed from them was "stolen" but I don't understand why would you even want to do that when the current systemd libudev.so works just fine.

rickeyski commented on 2013-03-01 00:14 (UTC)

here is a pkgbuild fix for the strip option as well as the shameless borrowing of gentoo's libudev fix https://gist.github.com/rickeyvisinski-kanban/5061325

HarD commented on 2013-02-28 05:44 (UTC)

I have error /usr/lib/yaourt/pkgbuild.sh: line 200: 19339 PKGDEST="$YPKGDEST" makepkg "${MAKEPKG_ARG[@]}" -s -f -p ./PKGBUILD

riccieri commented on 2013-02-28 02:51 (UTC)

@tuftedocelot I am. I solved this by negating "strip" from the OPTIONS array on /etc/makepkg.conf

tuftedocelot commented on 2013-02-28 02:23 (UTC)

Anybody receive this error message when updating?: http://bpaste.net/raw/80368/

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 .. 91 Next › Last »