Package Details: google-chrome-dev 128.0.6559.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/google-chrome-dev.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: google-chrome-dev
Description: The popular web browser by Google (Dev Channel)
Upstream URL: https://www.google.com/chrome
Keywords: chromium
Licenses: custom:chrome
Provides: google-chrome
Submitter: None
Maintainer: gromit
Last Packager: gromit
Votes: 649
Popularity: 0.31
First Submitted: 2009-06-05 21:02 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-06-27 21:11 (UTC)

Dependencies (12)

Required by (40)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

gromit commented on 2023-07-19 17:01 (UTC) (edited on 2023-07-19 17:02 (UTC) by gromit)

When reporting this package as outdated make sure there is indeed a new version for Linux Desktop. You can have a look at the "Dev updates" tag in Release blog for this.

You can also run this command to obtain the version string for the latest chrome version:

$ curl -sSf https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/main/binary-amd64/Packages | \
     grep -A1 "Package: google-chrome-unstable" | \
     awk '/Version/{print $2}' | \
     cut -d '-' -f1

Do not report updates for ChromeOS, Android or other platforms stable versions as updates here.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 .. 91 Next › Last »

t3ddy commented on 2011-05-03 19:39 (UTC)

Do you have libjpeg-turbo installed?

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-05-03 14:34 (UTC)

For me removing libjpeg6 works too.

t3ddy commented on 2011-05-02 16:26 (UTC)

In the .deb file, libjpeg6 is listed as dependency, although I've tried removing it and rebuilding the chrome package, everything seems fine. If someone else can make some tests, they'll be appreciated.

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-05-02 03:40 (UTC)

Does Chrome still depend on libjpeg6? I thought Chrome switched to libjpeg-turbo since 11? http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=48789

magicfish1990 commented on 2011-04-29 09:27 (UTC)

12.0.742.12 dev amd64 md5sum = d00818bf674f4f9122d020a26940930e

sjakub commented on 2011-04-29 08:01 (UTC)

If someone can't figure out things like current version number and MD5 sum, maybe they shouldn't be using the development version?

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-04-29 01:32 (UTC)

google-chrome-unstable_current_i386.deb ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build google-chrome-dev.

letroll commented on 2011-04-25 19:10 (UTC)

md5sum pour 64bits 33c0e4593a81909e4487477b7d42c744

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 .. 91 Next › Last »