Package Details: google-chrome 61.0.3163.91-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/google-chrome.git (read-only)
Package Base: google-chrome
Description: An attempt at creating a safer, faster, and more stable browser (Stable Channel)
Upstream URL: https://www.google.com/chrome
Keywords: chromium
Licenses: custom:chrome
Submitter: None
Maintainer: Det
Last Packager: Det
Votes: 1593
Popularity: 28.116785
First Submitted: 2010-05-25 20:25
Last Updated: 2017-09-17 18:03

Dependencies (13)

Required by (17)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

Det commented on 2016-03-09 05:01

✔ NOTE: If the md5sums don't match, don't post the makepkg output. Simply flag the package.

You can check for new Linux releases in: http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/search/label/Stable%20updates, or use:
$ curl -s https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/rpm/stable/x86_64/repodata/other.xml.gz | gzip -df | awk -F\" '/pkgid/{ sub(".*-","",$4); print $4": "$10 }'

Det commented on 2016-03-02 20:53

✔ OBS: 32-bit support for Google Chrome Stable Channel has been dropped as well. Either upgrade to 64-bit, or wait for phrakture to get hacked:

- https://www.archlinux.org/news/phasing-out-i686-support/

Latest Comments

naibafo commented on 2017-09-19 13:05

For everybody struggling with the installation of the newest update that use a caching AUR helper like 'pacaur'. You need to delete the repository-folder from the cache because eula_text.html was is now part of the repository but also still exists in an untracked version in your local cache.

For 'pacaur': 'rm -rf ~/.cache/pacaur/google-chrome'

Det commented on 2017-09-18 16:32

Seems there's some of those around:

- https://lists.gt.net/clamav/users/57364
- http://forums.clamwin.com/viewtopic.php?t=4203
- https://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?t=129646

If you reinstall and get the same thing, it's almost surely a false positive.

Tondo commented on 2017-09-18 15:59

ClamAV just threw /opt/google/chrome/chrome: Unix.Trojan.Mirai-5932143-0 FOUND

leondevlifelog commented on 2017-09-18 07:26

thanks,i has delete it(google-chrome-cn)

Det commented on 2017-09-17 17:56

Uhhh. Yea, I rather would, because that one will be deleted: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/google-chrome-cn/. You need to have something notable change in the package itself to create a separate one. Different source is not enough. :(

E: Added.

leondevlifelog commented on 2017-09-17 12:40

could you ues offline lisence file?
I am in China,due to GFW,I can download deb file,but i can not download eula_text file,it show time out error.

Det commented on 2017-09-14 19:24

Shouldn't have anything to do with package signing.

I just updated the package.

SACViper commented on 2017-09-14 19:23

I was getting was getting error
Google-chrome-stable.sh ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

Solution: I updated keys with this command and got installed without any error :)

sudo pacman-key --refresh-keys
sudo pacman-key --populate archlinux manjaro

darkxsun commented on 2017-09-07 00:03

@WorldwoWires probably relevant: https://www.designernews.co/stories/86411-google-chrome-rendering-colors-inaccurately

WorldwoWires commented on 2017-09-06 23:45

Is it just me or is something up with the color in google-chrome 61.0.3163.79-1? Seems to be washed out. Same with Chromium. It's definitely not in the previous versions after rolling back and updating and rolling back. What gives?

All comments