Package Details: google-chrome 129.0.6668.58-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/google-chrome.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: google-chrome
Description: The popular web browser by Google (Stable Channel)
Upstream URL: https://www.google.com/chrome
Keywords: chromium
Licenses: custom:chrome
Submitter: None
Maintainer: gromit
Last Packager: gromit
Votes: 2236
Popularity: 7.19
First Submitted: 2010-05-25 20:25 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-17 21:41 (UTC)

Dependencies (12)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

gromit commented on 2023-04-15 08:22 (UTC) (edited on 2023-05-08 21:42 (UTC) by gromit)

When reporting this package as outdated make sure there is indeed a new version for Linux Desktop. You can have a look at the "Stable updates" tag in Release blog for this.

You can also run this command to obtain the version string for the latest chrome version:

$ curl -sSf https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/main/binary-amd64/Packages | \
     grep -A1 "Package: google-chrome-stable" | \
     awk '/Version/{print $2}' | \
     cut -d '-' -f1

Do not report updates for ChromeOS, Android or other platforms stable versions as updates here.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 .. 157 Next › Last »

lrm commented on 2014-01-14 20:51 (UTC)

The deb fails validation on 64-bit build. New checksum is: 5eda4b45f5482e526252a819ed5e78a3

w1ntermute commented on 2014-01-14 20:13 (UTC)

I agree with the other commenters, you really should have incremented pkgrel. That's the reason why pkgrel exists, like Scimmia said. OK, you made a mistake at first, but there's no reason to keep digging a deeper hole for yourself - just admit that you made a mistake and don't let it happen again.

nDray commented on 2014-01-14 20:07 (UTC)

And if you must know, pkgrel should have been incremented

nDray commented on 2014-01-14 20:07 (UTC)

New version is out, just put people out of their misery with the update.

Scimmia commented on 2014-01-14 17:44 (UTC)

The real problem is that you didn't bump the pkgrel when you fixed the package in the first place. If the final binary package changes, you're supposed to bump the pkgrel. You failed.

big_bum commented on 2014-01-14 17:06 (UTC)

It will really be easier for all of us to simply increase the pgkrel. You are not rebuilding anything, you just have to edit one file...

Det commented on 2014-01-14 16:58 (UTC)

Unfortunately there's no such pkgrel that only affects those who have a "broken" system. When something that breaks things moves from [testing] to [core]/[extra] I'm against every single step of raising the pkgrel on any package that's not small as hell. It would have to be something seriously major and AUR rarely counts as such. That's life, that's Arch. If you don't have those libraries yet, then rebuild it or manually put them there. Those who do don't care.

Scimmia commented on 2014-01-14 16:39 (UTC)

nagging? It's required to rebuild it with the new libgcrypt, not nagging to help keep a working system.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 .. 157 Next › Last »