Package Details: google-chrome 131.0.6778.85-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/google-chrome.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: google-chrome
Description: The popular web browser by Google (Stable Channel)
Upstream URL: https://www.google.com/chrome
Keywords: chromium
Licenses: custom:chrome
Submitter: None
Maintainer: gromit
Last Packager: gromit
Votes: 2247
Popularity: 9.36
First Submitted: 2010-05-25 20:25 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-19 19:19 (UTC)

Dependencies (12)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

gromit commented on 2023-04-15 08:22 (UTC) (edited on 2023-05-08 21:42 (UTC) by gromit)

When reporting this package as outdated make sure there is indeed a new version for Linux Desktop. You can have a look at the "Stable updates" tag in Release blog for this.

You can also run this command to obtain the version string for the latest chrome version:

$ curl -sSf https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/main/binary-amd64/Packages | \
     grep -A1 "Package: google-chrome-stable" | \
     awk '/Version/{print $2}' | \
     cut -d '-' -f1

Do not report updates for ChromeOS, Android or other platforms stable versions as updates here.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 .. 157 Next › Last »

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-05-21 18:54 (UTC)

aha ! chrome 27 has been released ?

weedfreak commented on 2013-05-19 09:35 (UTC)

get error error: google-chrome: missing required signature :: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/google-chrome-26.0.1410.63-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).

Det commented on 2013-05-18 23:20 (UTC)

I see you are also experiencing vision problems.

latelx commented on 2013-05-17 05:55 (UTC)

experice flash audio problem.

Det commented on 2013-05-14 13:15 (UTC)

No, you don't have to email him, because he's already getting notifications of our comments.

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-05-13 22:32 (UTC)

Thanks @carukia & @Det, I've sent an email to the maintainer.

Det commented on 2013-05-13 17:58 (UTC)

@carukia, and I know it. See: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27263, https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2012-November/020859.html

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-05-13 17:26 (UTC)

@ryanpcmcquen I think only the maintainer can remove it.

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-05-13 16:51 (UTC)

Oops, accidentally flagged this out of date! Does anyone know how to remove the flag?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 .. 157 Next › Last »