Package Details: google-chrome 131.0.6778.69-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/google-chrome.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: google-chrome
Description: The popular web browser by Google (Stable Channel)
Upstream URL: https://www.google.com/chrome
Keywords: chromium
Licenses: custom:chrome
Submitter: None
Maintainer: gromit
Last Packager: gromit
Votes: 2244
Popularity: 7.52
First Submitted: 2010-05-25 20:25 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-12 20:25 (UTC)

Dependencies (12)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

gromit commented on 2023-04-15 08:22 (UTC) (edited on 2023-05-08 21:42 (UTC) by gromit)

When reporting this package as outdated make sure there is indeed a new version for Linux Desktop. You can have a look at the "Stable updates" tag in Release blog for this.

You can also run this command to obtain the version string for the latest chrome version:

$ curl -sSf https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/main/binary-amd64/Packages | \
     grep -A1 "Package: google-chrome-stable" | \
     awk '/Version/{print $2}' | \
     cut -d '-' -f1

Do not report updates for ChromeOS, Android or other platforms stable versions as updates here.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 .. 157 Next › Last »

cowai commented on 2012-03-29 12:55 (UTC)

Anybody experiencing blueish overlay on flash videos with the latest chrome? All youtube looks like Avatar now :P

Det commented on 2012-03-28 18:14 (UTC)

Yeah. That usually happens when they update their software and remove the old one.

Svenw commented on 2012-03-28 17:53 (UTC)

Looks like google has changed their download path as I get a 404 error on the AUR install, directly using the link above, or browsing the google site.

t3ddy commented on 2012-03-22 16:28 (UTC)

my mistake, again :)

wellington commented on 2012-03-22 14:58 (UTC)

Don't running without libpng12

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-03-22 02:06 (UTC)

17.0.963.83 is available now.

Det commented on 2012-03-12 12:36 (UTC)

What xduugu meant was that this was _supposed_ to depend on 'openssl098' (0.9.8.t) - instead of the even older 'openssl-compatibility' (0.9.8.n) that he put there by mistake.

kkimdev commented on 2012-03-12 01:50 (UTC)

@t3ddy wait, your PKGBUILD still depends on openssl098, not openssl-compatibility.

t3ddy commented on 2012-03-11 12:54 (UTC)

Fixed, thanks.

xduugu commented on 2012-03-11 09:27 (UTC)

I just want to point out that this new release depends on openssl-compatibility again. Dunno if this was intended.