Package Details: google-chrome 130.0.6723.116-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/google-chrome.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: google-chrome
Description: The popular web browser by Google (Stable Channel)
Upstream URL: https://www.google.com/chrome
Keywords: chromium
Licenses: custom:chrome
Submitter: None
Maintainer: gromit
Last Packager: gromit
Votes: 2243
Popularity: 7.15
First Submitted: 2010-05-25 20:25 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-05 19:02 (UTC)

Dependencies (12)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

gromit commented on 2023-04-15 08:22 (UTC) (edited on 2023-05-08 21:42 (UTC) by gromit)

When reporting this package as outdated make sure there is indeed a new version for Linux Desktop. You can have a look at the "Stable updates" tag in Release blog for this.

You can also run this command to obtain the version string for the latest chrome version:

$ curl -sSf https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/main/binary-amd64/Packages | \
     grep -A1 "Package: google-chrome-stable" | \
     awk '/Version/{print $2}' | \
     cut -d '-' -f1

Do not report updates for ChromeOS, Android or other platforms stable versions as updates here.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 .. 157 Next › Last »

t3ddy commented on 2012-03-11 08:50 (UTC)

This is not a good news since I'm using the same template for the three versions of chrome.

sanusart commented on 2012-03-11 08:33 (UTC)

[ Temporary ] Working PKGBUILD: http://pastebin.com/8puzXpTg

Det commented on 2012-03-10 19:43 (UTC)

T3ddy just figured that if the Dev Chrome was using it, so should this.

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-03-10 13:16 (UTC)

libpng12[0] is still a dependency, it seems to have gone missing from the PKGBUILD. [0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33795

Det commented on 2012-03-09 14:02 (UTC)

Because it's out of date.

crabman commented on 2012-03-09 13:55 (UTC)

building fails with: curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404

Det commented on 2012-03-08 20:35 (UTC)

Yes. Lucid doesn't use it.

mike.cloaked commented on 2012-03-08 20:06 (UTC)

Is there any reason it can't depend instead on the openssl 1.0 from core? http://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/i686/openssl/

xduugu commented on 2012-03-08 14:31 (UTC)

Could you please change the openssl-0.9.8 dependency from openssl-compatibility[1] to openssl098[2], since the former uses a build from 2010 which contains security issues. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36308 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40574

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 .. 157 Next › Last »