Package Details: google-chrome 132.0.6834.159-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/google-chrome.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: google-chrome
Description: The popular web browser by Google (Stable Channel)
Upstream URL: https://www.google.com/chrome
Keywords: chromium
Licenses: custom:chrome
Submitter: None
Maintainer: gromit
Last Packager: gromit
Votes: 2258
Popularity: 9.06
First Submitted: 2010-05-25 20:25 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-28 23:25 (UTC)

Dependencies (12)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

gromit commented on 2023-04-15 08:22 (UTC) (edited on 2023-05-08 21:42 (UTC) by gromit)

When reporting this package as outdated make sure there is indeed a new version for Linux Desktop. You can have a look at the "Stable updates" tag in Release blog for this.

You can also run this command to obtain the version string for the latest chrome version:

$ curl -sSf https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/main/binary-amd64/Packages | \
     grep -A1 "Package: google-chrome-stable" | \
     awk '/Version/{print $2}' | \
     cut -d '-' -f1

Do not report updates for ChromeOS, Android or other platforms stable versions as updates here.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 .. 157 Next › Last »

ruario commented on 2019-09-02 04:39 (UTC)

@tomrlopes That is not a problem. It has never been listed in chrome://components/ on Linux because it does not use the components mechanism to update on Linux. It is just a bundled file. Look for libwidevinecdm.so within the package. If you want to see if it is working, go to https://demo.castlabs.com and select one of the videos tagged with DRM.

tomrlopes commented on 2019-09-02 04:28 (UTC)

No widevinecdm in chrome://components/

kraftwerk28 commented on 2019-08-08 22:08 (UTC)

@yuu to enable dark mode just pass --force-dark-mode flag to the app

Det commented on 2019-07-16 10:44 (UTC) (edited on 2019-07-16 13:56 (UTC) by Det)

@TimOverboard, "trusted", because back when I maintained this thing the description used to be "An attempt at a faster, safer, more stable browser". Or something. Only so that the product would always stand on its own merit. Just, after a while people wanted change, so I made a poll and what-do-you-know this description won (see the very first pinned comment) :) (on top of which Chrome's got like 60% global usage share).

Either way, can't really see anything "inflammatory" about that, bro, nor does it somehow stigmatize luzifer as a troll to stick by a choice the majority decided on.

TimOverboard commented on 2019-07-16 10:26 (UTC) (edited on 2019-07-16 10:28 (UTC) by TimOverboard)

Description: The popular and trusted web browser by Google

The word trusted is unneccesary, subjective, promoting and inflammatory. Why would you state this as a fact? You are troll, yes? I sincerely hope so because the alternatives actually ruin my day.

I don't care how much longer you've been using arch and/or Linux than me.. just sort this out will you. It's grossly offensive to see it in my AUR search results.

JohnML commented on 2019-07-16 09:38 (UTC)

just updated my google-chrome to:

Google itself tells me: Version 75.0.3770.100 (Offizieller Build) (64-Bit)

but yay tells me it installed ok: google-chrome-75.0.3770.142-1

i used yay -Su

Google works ok, but are these two version different??

info: CPU: Quad Core Intel Core i5-6400 (-MCP-) speed/min/max: 800/800/3300 MHz Kernel: 5.1.16-1-MANJARO x86_64 Up: 26m Mem: 4018.2/15986.4 MiB (25.1%) Storage: 3.18 TiB (11.3% used) Procs: 234 Shell: bash 5.0.7 inxi: 3.0.34

Pamac refused to install: database locked

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 .. 157 Next › Last »