Package Details: google-chrome 129.0.6668.58-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/google-chrome.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: google-chrome
Description: The popular web browser by Google (Stable Channel)
Upstream URL: https://www.google.com/chrome
Keywords: chromium
Licenses: custom:chrome
Submitter: None
Maintainer: gromit
Last Packager: gromit
Votes: 2237
Popularity: 7.89
First Submitted: 2010-05-25 20:25 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-17 21:41 (UTC)

Dependencies (12)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

gromit commented on 2023-04-15 08:22 (UTC) (edited on 2023-05-08 21:42 (UTC) by gromit)

When reporting this package as outdated make sure there is indeed a new version for Linux Desktop. You can have a look at the "Stable updates" tag in Release blog for this.

You can also run this command to obtain the version string for the latest chrome version:

$ curl -sSf https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/main/binary-amd64/Packages | \
     grep -A1 "Package: google-chrome-stable" | \
     awk '/Version/{print $2}' | \
     cut -d '-' -f1

Do not report updates for ChromeOS, Android or other platforms stable versions as updates here.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 .. 157 Next › Last »

Det commented on 2019-07-16 10:44 (UTC) (edited on 2019-07-16 13:56 (UTC) by Det)

@TimOverboard, "trusted", because back when I maintained this thing the description used to be "An attempt at a faster, safer, more stable browser". Or something. Only so that the product would always stand on its own merit. Just, after a while people wanted change, so I made a poll and what-do-you-know this description won (see the very first pinned comment) :) (on top of which Chrome's got like 60% global usage share).

Either way, can't really see anything "inflammatory" about that, bro, nor does it somehow stigmatize luzifer as a troll to stick by a choice the majority decided on.

TimOverboard commented on 2019-07-16 10:26 (UTC) (edited on 2019-07-16 10:28 (UTC) by TimOverboard)

Description: The popular and trusted web browser by Google

The word trusted is unneccesary, subjective, promoting and inflammatory. Why would you state this as a fact? You are troll, yes? I sincerely hope so because the alternatives actually ruin my day.

I don't care how much longer you've been using arch and/or Linux than me.. just sort this out will you. It's grossly offensive to see it in my AUR search results.

JohnML commented on 2019-07-16 09:38 (UTC)

just updated my google-chrome to:

Google itself tells me: Version 75.0.3770.100 (Offizieller Build) (64-Bit)

but yay tells me it installed ok: google-chrome-75.0.3770.142-1

i used yay -Su

Google works ok, but are these two version different??

info: CPU: Quad Core Intel Core i5-6400 (-MCP-) speed/min/max: 800/800/3300 MHz Kernel: 5.1.16-1-MANJARO x86_64 Up: 26m Mem: 4018.2/15986.4 MiB (25.1%) Storage: 3.18 TiB (11.3% used) Procs: 234 Shell: bash 5.0.7 inxi: 3.0.34

Pamac refused to install: database locked

yuu commented on 2019-07-16 00:06 (UTC)

How to enable dark mode? I'm using Arch Linux and KDE plasma. GTK "Prefer Dark theme" is enabled but my google chrome still not in dark mode.

I've installed dark theme but I want dark mode. Address bar still white.

Help me. lol

jpvaldez26 commented on 2019-07-05 01:08 (UTC)

Flash not present on Chrome-Browser-Stable.

bianjp commented on 2019-05-17 02:02 (UTC)

The flash bug has been accepted by Chromium: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=949312

By the way, it's quite strange that Chromium still works with flash while Chrome does not.

imwxz commented on 2019-05-12 15:54 (UTC)

+1 flash not work. Temporary solution is to use

google-chrome-stable --no-sandbox

But you may get an ugly warning and may be not safe?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 .. 157 Next › Last »