Arch Linux User Repository

/home/simona/.cache/yay/jucipp/src/jucipp/src/source.cpp: In lambda function: /home/simona/.cache/yay/jucipp/src/jucipp/src/source.cpp:1196:46: error: use of deleted function ‘void boost::property_tree::basic_ptree<Key, Data, KeyCompare>::get_child(const path_type&, const self_type&&) const [with Key = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>; Data = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>; KeyCompare = std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string\<char> >; path_type = boost::property_tree::string_path<std::__cxx11::basic_string\<char>, boost::property_tree::id_translator\<std::__cxx11::basic_string\<char> > >; self_type = boost::property_tree::basic_ptree<std::__cxx11::basic_string\<char>, std::__cxx11::basic_string\<char> >]’

Release doesn't build on current archlinux system:

/xxxxx/jucipp/src/jucipp/src/source.cpp: In lambda function:
/xxxxx/jucipp/src/jucipp/src/source.cpp:1196:46: error: use of deleted function ‘void boost::property_tree::basic_ptree<Key, Data, KeyCompare>::get_child(const path_type&, const self_type&&) const [with Key = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>; Data = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>; KeyCompare = std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >; path_type = boost::property_tree::string_path<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>, boost::property_tree::id_translator<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> > >; self_type = boost::property_tree::basic_ptree<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >]’
 1196 |           auto replacements_pt = pt.get_child("replacements", boost::property_tree::ptree());
      |                                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/boost/property_tree/xml_parser.hpp:14,
                 from /xxxxx/jucipp/src/jucipp/src/source.hpp:7,
                 from /xxxxx/jucipp/src/jucipp/src/source.cpp:1:
/usr/include/boost/property_tree/ptree.hpp:274:14: note: declared here
  274 |         void get_child(const path_type &path,
      |              ^~~~~~~~~
/xxxxx/jucipp/src/jucipp/src/source.cpp:1196:46: note: use ‘-fdiagnostics-all-candidates’ to display considered candidates
 1196 |           auto replacements_pt = pt.get_child("replacements", boost::property_tree::ptree());
      |                                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/xxxxx/jucipp/src/jucipp/src/source.cpp:1199:50: error: expected primary-expression before ‘>’ token
 1199 |               auto offset = it->second.get<size_t>("<xmlattr>.offset");
      |                                                  ^
/xxxxx/jucipp/src/jucipp/src/source.cpp:1200:50: error: expected primary-expression before ‘>’ token
 1200 |               auto length = it->second.get<size_t>("<xmlattr>.length");
      |                                                  ^
/xxxxx/jucipp/src/jucipp/src/source.cpp:1201:64: error: expected primary-expression before ‘>’ token
 1201 |               auto replacement_str = it->second.get<std::string>("");
      |                                                                ^

Seems to be fixed in -git.

@dkaparis Thank you. This should be fixed in the v1.6.2 release.

Building seems broken:

In file included from /xxxxx/jucipp/src/jucipp/src/cmake.cpp:6:
/xxxxx/jucipp/src/jucipp/src/terminal.hpp:64:21: error: field 'perform_scroll_to_bottom' has incomplete type 'std::atomic<bool>'
64 |   std::atomic<bool> perform_scroll_to_bottom = {false};
   |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Relevant package versions:

cmake 3.19.2-1
boost 1.75.0-2
gcc 10.2.0-4

The -git package doesn't have the issue.

@Krasauskas Most likely, you have upgraded your system, and liblldb (part of llvm) version 8 got replaced with version 9. You then have to rebuild jucipp, so that it is built against liblldb version 9 instead.

While trying to launch it, I'm getting

juci: error while loading shared libraries: liblldb.so.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

I swear it used to work a few weeks ago. Anything I can do?

@fusion809, sure I can take over

@erdheim, I don't use this package any more so I'm going to give up this package and I'll assume you'll want to take over it, which make sense since you're the upstream developer right?