Search Criteria
Package Details: ctags-git 5.9.20220417.0.r9.gb35f157c4-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/ctags-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | ctags-git |
Description: | Generates an index (or tag) file of language objects found in source files |
Upstream URL: | https://ctags.io |
Licenses: | GPL |
Conflicts: | ctags |
Provides: | ctags |
Submitter: | polyzen |
Maintainer: | haawda |
Last Packager: | haawda |
Votes: | 61 |
Popularity: | 0.23 |
First Submitted: | 2021-01-14 17:35 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-04-19 12:57 (UTC) |
Dependencies (6)
- jansson (jansson-git)
- libseccomp (libseccomp-git)
- libxml2 (libxml2-git)
- libyaml (libyaml-git)
- git (git-git, git-vfs, git-run-command-patch-git) (make)
- python-docutils (make)
Required by (70)
- abi-compliance-checker (requires ctags)
- abi-dumper (requires ctags)
- arcadia (requires ctags) (optional)
- atom (requires ctags) (optional)
- atom-editor-git (requires ctags) (optional)
- atom-transparent (requires ctags) (optional)
- autotags (requires ctags)
- cinelerra-gg (requires ctags) (make)
- cinelerra-gg-git (requires ctags) (make)
- codelite (requires ctags)
- codelite-unstable (requires ctags)
- codequery (requires ctags) (optional)
- cpp2dia (requires ctags)
- dte (requires ctags) (optional)
- dte-git (requires ctags) (optional)
- efm-langserver (requires ctags) (optional)
- emacs-ctags-update (requires ctags)
- enki-editor (requires ctags) (optional)
- enki-editor-git (requires ctags) (optional)
- fzf-extras (requires ctags) (optional)
Latest Comments
mattematt commented on 2021-07-03 15:01 (UTC)
There seems to be some kind of version mismatch with this package. On the AUR it says it is version
5.9.20210110.0.r12.g14609424-1
but when you install it you get versionctags-git-5.9.20210627.0.r0.gc436bca61-1
I have tried updating manually, usingyay
AUR helper, and deleting and reinstalling, and they all show the same issueFelixoid commented on 2021-02-02 11:18 (UTC)
Hello. I kindly ask you to update the description of the package. It would be nice to include the note about included universal-ctags patches.
polyzen commented on 2020-12-01 03:29 (UTC)
Cannot reproduce with
makepkg -Cisr
.darnir commented on 2020-11-25 00:36 (UTC)
Cannot build this package if
BUILDDIR
is set inmakepkg.conf
. One ends up with the same error as reported by @static_n00bstatic_n00b commented on 2020-10-20 22:44 (UTC)
@polyzen: strange, I've installed quite a few AUR packages using
pacaur
here's a partial log of
pacaur -Syu universal-ctags-git
(invoked afterpacaur Sc
):That's all folks!
polyzen commented on 2020-10-20 22:19 (UTC)
fenuks, I prefer to leave
arch=()
to the officially supported arch/es, and use makepkg's-A
option for the rest.static_n00b, built fine for me in a container: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_clean_chroot
fenuks commented on 2020-10-19 20:01 (UTC)
@polyzen Could you please add more architectures (I have it running on
aarch64
).polyzen commented on 2020-10-13 04:09 (UTC)
Deleted the sources, did a clean build, and now my
pkgver
has fallen in line ┐(ツ)┌.btmcg commented on 2020-10-13 02:41 (UTC)
Can confirm I see the exact results as @pepper_chico and @kseistrup.
SolarAquarion commented on 2020-10-13 02:28 (UTC)
there's only one tag https://github.com/universal-ctags/ctags/releases/tag/p5.9.20201011.0
pepper_chico commented on 2020-10-13 01:52 (UTC) (edited on 2020-10-13 01:53 (UTC) by pepper_chico)
@polyzen just not sure what's happening, except that the
git describe
/sed
result in your machine is one character longer than ours.polyzen commented on 2020-10-13 00:38 (UTC)
pepper_chico commented on 2020-10-12 18:20 (UTC) (edited on 2020-10-12 18:21 (UTC) by pepper_chico)
Same issue here:
It seems this
git describe
/sed
command is giving one character longer in the package maintainer's machine. Notice that thissed
regex isn't listed in the recommendedpkgver
guidelines: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_package_guidelines.kseistrup commented on 2020-10-12 09:49 (UTC)
That's interesting, because if I do the “git describe” dance I get
and
which is also the package name I end up with if I install it with
yay
.I wonder what is happening here. Any ideas?
polyzen commented on 2020-10-12 09:17 (UTC)
==> Finished making: universal-ctags-git 5.9.20201011.0.r12.g01b9fc866-1 (Mon 12 Oct 2020 05:12:13 AM EDT)
Producing
universal-ctags-git-5.9.20201011.0.r12.g01b9fc866-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst
kseistrup commented on 2020-10-12 08:06 (UTC)
There's a ‘6’ too much at the end of
When the package is built, you end up with
and next time you run
yay
it thinks there's a newer version.Maelan commented on 2018-08-25 03:18 (UTC)
Does not build for me. Compiling the man pages fail, even with python{,2}-docutils installed:
lenormf commented on 2018-07-27 13:59 (UTC)
I think
bash
should be removed from the list of runtime dependencies.cbb commented on 2018-06-22 03:55 (UTC) (edited on 2018-06-22 05:41 (UTC) by cbb)
@J5lx Yeah, I understand your line of thinking. My line of thinking is rather that AUR is an absolute wild west anyway, so a little bit of ill-considered patching can't hurt the standards of quality much.
I've pushed
uctags-git
for anyone else who may want a universal-ctags package that can be installed in parallel withctags
.J5lx commented on 2018-06-07 11:10 (UTC)
@cbb I see your point, but ctags is what upstream chose and I’m not exactly a fan of making more downstream changes than necessary – just like the TUs are advised not to include any patches in official packages that have not been accepted into upstream. Besides, ctags is often used internally by other tools and some of them might not allow changing the binary used.
Jesse2004 commented on 2018-06-07 02:59 (UTC)
This package should be in the official repository...
cbb commented on 2018-06-02 11:36 (UTC) (edited on 2018-06-02 11:43 (UTC) by cbb)
Any chance we could rename
/usr/bin/ctags
to/usr/bin/uctags
and removeconflicts=('ctags')
? Many distros still only package the original ctags and it's useful to be able to install both on Arch for testing compatibility etc.J5lx commented on 2018-02-14 15:37 (UTC)
That's right, but those packages are in base-devel and thus assumed to be installed and not explicitly listed.
polm23 commented on 2018-02-14 13:42 (UTC)
This depends on autoconf and automake.
maximbaz commented on 2017-11-02 22:51 (UTC)
cbb commented on 2017-08-31 19:32 (UTC)
cbb commented on 2017-08-31 19:24 (UTC)
blueyed commented on 2017-07-01 23:21 (UTC)
J5lx commented on 2017-06-26 13:19 (UTC)
blueyed commented on 2017-06-07 20:22 (UTC)
beka commented on 2017-04-10 13:23 (UTC)
commented on 2017-03-27 19:44 (UTC)
aklt commented on 2017-02-28 03:28 (UTC)
blueyed commented on 2017-01-21 21:22 (UTC)
blueyed commented on 2017-01-21 21:21 (UTC)
hexchain commented on 2017-01-14 12:33 (UTC)
Viterzgir commented on 2017-01-01 23:02 (UTC) (edited on 2017-01-02 00:06 (UTC) by Viterzgir)
sim590 commented on 2016-09-27 22:39 (UTC)
Jesse2004 commented on 2016-08-31 07:39 (UTC)
johnLate commented on 2016-08-18 18:31 (UTC)
zsrkmyn commented on 2015-12-18 15:15 (UTC)
killozap commented on 2015-12-10 22:09 (UTC)
commented on 2015-12-08 17:09 (UTC)
commented on 2015-12-03 19:44 (UTC)
4e6 commented on 2015-12-03 19:09 (UTC)
killozap commented on 2015-11-17 16:03 (UTC)
commented on 2015-11-09 18:13 (UTC)
petr.fischer commented on 2015-11-09 12:47 (UTC)
commented on 2015-07-10 21:09 (UTC)
marsam commented on 2015-07-10 00:50 (UTC)
commented on 2015-07-09 16:54 (UTC)
zsrkmyn commented on 2015-07-09 07:11 (UTC)