Package Details: julia-git 1.11.0.r56788.g501a4f25c2b-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/julia-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: julia-git
Description: High-level, high-performance, dynamic programming language
Upstream URL: https://julialang.org/
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: julia
Provides: julia
Submitter: mihi
Maintainer: TrialnError (fusion809, mar)
Last Packager: TrialnError
Votes: 54
Popularity: 0.133059
First Submitted: 2012-02-22 08:57 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-10-12 19:47 (UTC)

Required by (19)

Sources (7)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 21 Next › Last »

snowball commented on 2013-07-04 06:06 (UTC)

TrialnError, I can confirm the issue fhs mentioned on x86_64 as well, using blas from extra.

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-07-03 18:40 (UTC)

Hi again, here's an update. I force an reinstall of openblas with 64 bit integer support. This remedies the problem. So any user can either 1) Install openblas from AUR but set USE_BLAS64=0 in Julia 2) Edit openblas PKGBUILD from AUR to include 8byte integer support With 2), under build(), just add INTERFACE64=1 to make to compile with 8byte integer support.

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-07-03 16:43 (UTC)

I have the same issue too $ julia ERROR: OpenBLAS was not built with 64bit integer support. You're seeing this error because Julia was built with USE_BLAS64=1 Please rebuild Julia with USE_BLAS64=0 Quitting. I use Blas from extra. openBlas is not installed

TrialnError commented on 2013-07-02 20:44 (UTC)

Right. In that case I need other x86 users that can confirm your problem

fhs commented on 2013-07-01 18:04 (UTC)

TrialnError, I forgot to mention, I'm using 64-bit archlinux. It looks like you're using 32-bit archlinux ("i686-pc-linux-gnu").

TrialnError commented on 2013-07-01 17:55 (UTC)

fhs: I cannot reproduce your issue (blas from extra), freshly build $ julia _ _ _ _(_)_ | A fresh approach to technical computing (_) | (_) (_) | Documentation: http://docs.julialang.org _ _ _| |_ __ _ | Type "help()" to list help topics | | | | | | |/ _` | | | | |_| | | | (_| | | Version 0.2.0-2330.ra5405554 _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_| | Commit a540555445 2013-07-01 18:42:01 |__/ | i686-pc-linux-gnu julia>

fhs commented on 2013-06-29 04:48 (UTC)

julia gave me this error: $ julia ERROR: OpenBLAS was not built with 64bit integer support. You're seeing this error because Julia was built with USE_BLAS64=1 Please rebuild Julia with USE_BLAS64=0 Quitting. It works after I rebuild julia with USE_BLAS64=0. I'm using AUR openblas. I haven't verified if it works with the blas package in Extra but I was getting the same error when using that package before I decided to replace it with openblas.

TrialnError commented on 2013-06-16 23:09 (UTC)

As a sidenote https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/3418 The building will fail at the moment with the system llvm3.3. Let julia build it's own version, or wait if it will be fixed upstream

TrialnError commented on 2013-06-16 22:25 (UTC)

Yes, they're writing that. But if Julia compiles it's own librmath, than it should be also the standalone library. So it should work with that

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-06-13 15:01 (UTC)

The question is whether this works. On R's website ( http://www.cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#The-standalone-Rmath-library ) it explicitly says the the standalone library differs from what R uses internally.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 21 Next › Last »