Package Details: linux-ck 6.11.10-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.28
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (7)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .. 308 Next › Last »

BS86 commented on 2023-04-10 16:12 (UTC) (edited on 2023-04-10 16:23 (UTC) by BS86)

something is strange.

On my notebook I could build the update on release day. on my Desktop that I can only update now, I get a sha256sum mismatch when trying to build. No matter how often I download https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/linux-6.2.10.tar.xz the sha256sum I get is 57c562c3cd2753f232549cab05c8ad770ed848ae86401619c7581bdffaeea4fe not 7de856a284e57e23b8744b2708fe49d49aebe3510c3eee2dd6342e3b5e46ecf2 like expected in the PKGBUILD - is upstream broken/infected or is something off on my end?

Edit: I did now download the file on my phone using mobile internet, and the sha256sum is 57c562c3cd2753f232549cab05c8ad770ed848ae86401619c7581bdffaeea4fe too - so something definitely changed upstream after the release ...

graysky commented on 2023-03-26 11:34 (UTC)

Thanks @glitsj16 - I will update the repo with 6.2.8-2. Others please comment here if you notice any performance regressions.

glitsj16 commented on 2023-03-25 06:42 (UTC)

Building 6.2.8-2 in progress. But after your latest rebase the ck-hrtimer patches are exactly the same as what I used in my 6.2.7-1 / 6.2.8-1. Can confirm both build fine. Didn't notice any regressions or performance drops compared to 6.1.12-1 (the latest available in your repo). All in all I think the 6.2.y is looking good now.

graysky commented on 2023-03-25 06:11 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-25 06:14 (UTC) by graysky)

Ah, I missed that one. See here: https://github.com/graysky2/linux-patches/commit/a8be5531ff07e300525c20bdbbe38cc6a665a0c4

Does building 6.2.8-2 work for you? Any performance issues?

glitsj16 commented on 2023-03-25 02:46 (UTC)

@graysky I do notice a difference between our 0004-hrtimer-Replace-all-schedule-timeout-1-with-schedule.patch files. Here's mine:

https://gist.github.com/glitsj16/b082da47c46ef9f3cb444798b32b35f7

glitsj16 commented on 2023-03-24 08:31 (UTC)

@graysky I'm doing a rebuild of 6.2.8 using your rebased patches right now. My earlier build didn't have the 0002-bpf-x86-Fix-IP-after-emitting-call-depth-accounting.patch, so I included that too. Will post the results here asap. Thanks for your work!

graysky commented on 2023-03-24 07:59 (UTC)

Thanks @glitsj16

I applied it and rebased. In doing so I found that I had to change 0004-hrtimer-Replace-all-schedule-timeout-1-with-schedule.patch ... can you take a look at that and let me know if I did it correctly? Building 6.2.8 was successful.

https://github.com/graysky2/linux-patches/commit/a27ac12de07749d0c935249d5031514b6cbd1a35

glitsj16 commented on 2023-03-22 22:01 (UTC)

I am getting a similar error. I need some help rebasing 6.2 into the patches.

@graysky Here's my attempt at fixing the rebase: https://gist.github.com/glitsj16/46ba4eebbde9727577c2a2075dfda3c1 - tested with 6.2.7 (6.2.8 is building right now).

BS86 commented on 2023-03-02 18:10 (UTC)

Unfortunately my skill levels are far too low for that and my time currently is too limited to acquire those skills. I can edit PKGBUILD's just fine, but everything else is way above me.

graysky commented on 2023-02-22 19:38 (UTC)

I am getting a similar error. I need some help rebasing 6.2 into the patches.

  CC [M]  arch/x86/kvm/x86.o
  CC      crypto/aes_generic.o
kernel/sysctl.c:1666:35: error: ‘sysctl_numa_balancing’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘sysctl_numa_balancing_mode’?
 1666 |                 .proc_handler   = sysctl_numa_balancing,
      |                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                   sysctl_numa_balancing_mode
  CC      kernel/time/tick-sched.o
  CC [M]  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.o
  CC      lib/zstd/zstd_common_module.o
kernel/sysctl.c:1672:36: error: ‘sysctl_numa_balancing_promote_rate_limit’ undeclared here (not in a function)
 1672 |                 .data           = &sysctl_numa_balancing_promote_rate_limit,
      |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  CC      drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-emmitsburg.o
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:252: kernel/sysctl.o] Error 1

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .. 308 Next › Last »