Package Details: linux-pf 6.11.pf4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-pf.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-pf
Description: The pf-kernel and modules
Upstream URL: https://pfkernel.natalenko.name
Keywords: bbr bbr3 kernel ksm linux linux-pf pf-kernel uksm uksmd v4l2loopback zstd
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, linux-pf, NTFS3-MODULE, UKSMD-BUILTIN, V4L2LOOPBACK-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: nous
Maintainer: post-factum
Last Packager: post-factum
Votes: 209
Popularity: 0.23
First Submitted: 2011-07-24 12:01 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-06 15:49 (UTC)

Dependencies (17)

Required by (14)

Sources (2)

Pinned Comments

post-factum commented on 2023-09-25 20:30 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-08 14:21 (UTC) by post-factum)

Official binary builds for various x86_64 ISA levels are available here.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 .. 106 Next › Last »

martadinata666 commented on 2012-10-29 23:31 (UTC)

so afaik, this have its own patch package which u can use just on bare linux 3.6 not 3.6.x :)

Thaodan commented on 2012-10-29 21:38 (UTC)

So its not 3.6.4?

Det commented on 2012-10-29 17:46 (UTC)

Yes.

Thaodan commented on 2012-10-29 13:57 (UTC)

One question: Is it right that the kernel version is 3.6?

Thaodan commented on 2012-10-29 13:13 (UTC)

@nous I don't that there shoud be packages for all these cpu familys, its just nice too have, if you need i can upload builds for corei7avx and coreavxi

nous commented on 2012-10-29 12:59 (UTC)

@claudiaj: I've not encountered the zram issue myself, on several computers I run this kernel. The reports you point to indicate it's not linux-pf related though; therefore, we should expect a fix from upstream.

nous commented on 2012-10-29 07:40 (UTC)

I'm building 3.6.6-pf for i686 now. The problem with dropbox is solved, and right now the daemon is uploading 3.6.5-2/64-bit; 3.6.6 for x86_64 will follow before the end of the day. @Thaodan: it's not the menuconfig I'm concerned about, it's the PKGBUILD which should reflect the extra CPUs and the extra time, cpu-power and webspace needed to build and accommodate the additional packages. Which, I still insist, are not worth building as there's no gain whatsoever in performance kernel-wise. That being said, I might add the patch to an upcoming release, but I'll have to decide whether or not let the PKGBUILD know about i7*.

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-10-28 23:40 (UTC)

@jakob: I had no intention to come off as rude. My main concern is zram, I just noted that after nous has stated 'Should be OK now', http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11734958/ still 404's, indicating that not all is gravy just yet. I have this unfortunate tendency to spend days fine tuning menuconfig getting rid of stuff I'll never use and adding things I might think I'd like to see. Just my luck would have it though, there's always an update ready by the time I finish :P

Thaodan commented on 2012-10-28 23:33 (UTC)

@nou: this patch dosn't modifies the kernel code it just adds the option to set the right -march and -mtune for cpus that are never than year 2007 in menuconfig.

jakob commented on 2012-10-28 23:07 (UTC)

Hey claudiaj, this service by nous is an exceptional contribution that he has been committing since a long time now! I think we should be a bit more patient if there are computer problems on his side! It's always possible to just build the kernel, the PKGBUILDs are there, if you're in such need to have it now!

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 .. 106 Next › Last »