Arch Linux User Repository

The next person who discusses keygens will have their account suspended indefinitely.

He doesn't seem to have that much time, in these times it's difficult to be everywhere

Maybe he will at least be available after the COVID events, or maybe before

@bkb: That patch needs to be applied with git in a second shell while the install runs - nothing a typical end user would do.

I marked the package as outdated in order to notify the maintainer. He removed the mark, so he monitors things, but did not change the script.

@asamarin I'm not sure of how this patch should work, I'm used to get and install those packages with yay, so I don't really have the method to apply it

However if it fixes for everyone I guess that it should be fine. The maintainer should push it and I will try it when he will do so, and if a new problem arises I will make a new comment here and we will think about it

If it's not an automatic update, the maintainer last intervention look like been at 2020-04-07 19:28 on chromium-widevine, and his last comment at 2020-03-29 14:14 in grass. So i don't know where he is but he should see our comments, if he's fine

@asamarin The patch wasn't chopped off. If it were, the patch tool would complain because the line counts in the hunk would not match. The end of it is the "if [...] then" statement in the existing file - because you're looking at a diff of a diff. The sha1 sum discrepancy is due to whitespace differences.

Hey guys @yannleretaille and @nursoda: I wanted to apply this same patch given the positive reactions towards it, but it turns out it's incomplete! Take a closer look at the last line, it seems to be chopped after an "if [ ... ] then" statement. That's likely the reason checksum didn't match, and I guess it was chopped without @bkb noticing due to some sort of comment size/line-count limit.

If @bkb or somebody else can get the last part of the patch posted here, that'd be great; on the other hand, it seems to not be terribly important since it still worked for you guys.

I can also confirm that the package installs fine on a newly installed arch with the patch installed. However, I had to adjust the second checksum, not sure why.

I can confirm wild34s patch fixes the issue. It would probably make sense to update the package accordingly (for now).

Alors ouiiii euhh, ça marche paaass euuhh

Ou devrais-je dire

Same as @unixtastic, it seems to be a problem related to C libraries and Qt

For reference: https://www.reddit.com/r/openSUSE/comments/fj9seb/masterpdfeditor5_cannot_be_launched_anymore/

@farseerfc consider the following git patch to fix the annoying issue with Qt libs.

diff --git a/PKGBUILD b/PKGBUILD
index cdfb30e..e0a6916 100644
--- a/PKGBUILD
+++ b/PKGBUILD
@@ -11,8 +11,13 @@ url='https://code-industry.net/free-pdf-editor/'
 arch=('x86_64')
 license=('custom')
 makedepends=('patchelf')
-source_x86_64=("https://code-industry.net/public/master-pdf-editor-${pkgver}-qt5.amd64.tar.gz")
-sha1sums_x86_64=('fd3e19479a298bfe6770b5dddd67b009742e9321')
+source_x86_64=("https://code-industry.net/public/master-pdf-editor-${pkgver}-qt5-all.amd64.tar.gz" "masterpdfeditor.sh.patch")
+sha1sums_x86_64=('bff9d66b531e60603a9221cf6bd2595c6bf602d6'
+                 'bc98283763d229f6d0d0a50350fb02daeba9238c')
+prepare() {
+    cd "$srcdir/master-pdf-editor-${pkgver%%.*}"
+    patch -p1 -i "$srcdir/masterpdfeditor.sh.patch"
+}

 package() {
   depends=('gcc-libs' 'glibc' 'libgl' 'nspr' 'nss' 'qt5-base' 'qt5-svg' 'sane')
@@ -21,7 +26,7 @@ package() {
   cp -a --no-preserve=ownership master-pdf-editor-${pkgver%%.*} "$pkgdir/opt/"

   cd "$pkgdir/opt/master-pdf-editor-${pkgver%%.*}"
-  ln -sr masterpdfeditor${pkgver%%.*} -t "$pkgdir/usr/bin/"
+  ln -sr masterpdfeditor${pkgver%%.*}.sh "$pkgdir/usr/bin/masterpdfeditor${pkgver%%.*}"
   install -Dm644 masterpdfeditor${pkgver%%.*}.desktop -t "$pkgdir/usr/share/applications/"
   install -Dm644 license.txt -t "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/"
   patchelf --remove-rpath masterpdfeditor${pkgver%%.*}
diff --git a/masterpdfeditor.sh.patch b/masterpdfeditor.sh.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7a31742
--- /dev/null
+++ b/masterpdfeditor.sh.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+--- a/masterpdfeditor5.sh  2020-03-27 10:57:36.818464325 +0100
++++ b/masterpdfeditor5.sh  2020-03-27 10:58:22.561935668 +0100
+@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
+ #!/bin/sh
+  appname=`basename $0 | sed s,\.sh$,,`
+- libpath=$(cd "$(dirname "$0")"; pwd)
+- dirname=`dirname $0`
++ libpath="$(cd $(dirname "$(readlink -f "$0")"); pwd)"
++ dirname="$libpath"
+  tmp="${dirname#?}"
+  
+  if [ "${dirname%$tmp}" != "/" ]; then

@unixtastic Did you read what's below your comment ? Everything is explained. 1. remove Aur version 2. download the "all" version from Code Industry 3. Install it 4. run /opt/master-pdf-editor-5/masterpdfeditor5.sh 5. smile :)