Package Details: mutter-performance 1:47.1.r2.g74cf8ac0f-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/mutter-performance.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: mutter-performance
Description: A window manager for GNOME | Attempts to improve performances with non-upstreamed merge-requests and frequent stable branch resync
Upstream URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Groups: gnome
Conflicts: mutter
Provides: libmutter-15.so, mutter
Submitter: Terence
Maintainer: Terence (Saren, saltyming)
Last Packager: saltyming
Votes: 78
Popularity: 0.186852
First Submitted: 2019-07-09 09:35 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-10-22 08:26 (UTC)

Required by (16)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

saltyming commented on 2022-03-22 09:37 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-22 08:27 (UTC) by saltyming)

If you have a problem during any system update with mutter-performance & gnome-shell-performance, please install mutter & gnome-shell packages from the main repository and do full upgrade first, then build the performance packages later.

If you are using [gnome-unstable] and [extra-testing] repositories, use mutter-performance-unstable

The default patch list includes "Dynamic triple buffering(!1441)", "text-input-v1(!3751)".

Latest Dynamic triple buffering patch has several included MRs from the main development branch to achieve maximum performance.

To enable a specific MR in the Merge Requests List, add an line "_merge_requests_to_use+=('<MR number>')" at the end of PKGBUILD. (Because if you edit the line directly you can be able to end up with merge conflict upon updates.)

You can see some patches' git history here: https://git.saltyming.net/sungmg/mutter-performance-source/

Saren commented on 2018-08-30 14:52 (UTC) (edited on 2020-10-06 05:50 (UTC) by Saren)

If you are getting errors like fatal: bad revision '73e8cf32' while building this package, refer to PKGBUILD and see which patches caused this. Then, go to the related URLs, replace the commit hashes. If there are conflicts, comment out the patches.

Please notify me in comment section if this happens.

The optional performance patches are by default enabled.

A package for gnome-shell performance patches: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-performance/

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 .. 64 Next › Last »

deezid commented on 2019-01-27 20:58 (UTC)

@Terence, please do. Just realized that activities even stay smooth (with just some slight lag) when I'm rendering 4k videos at 100% CPU usage. Great!

Terence commented on 2019-01-27 20:50 (UTC)

@deezid really happy to know it's working well for you :D I need to push a new version of gnome-shell-performance though because one of the patches introduces a bug with the workspace switcher.

deezid commented on 2019-01-27 20:47 (UTC)

@Terence DAMN!!! This build is freaking fantastic! Kinda mind-blowing how smooth it now is. KDE feels sluggish in comparison - even XFCE does.

Gotta build Gnome-shell-performance now and see if it can speed up activities even more.

Terence commented on 2019-01-27 19:36 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-27 20:48 (UTC) by Terence)

@Saren I pushed a new version, what do you think?

calindan2013 commented on 2019-01-27 14:50 (UTC)

this does not build, the packages is useless.

deezid commented on 2019-01-23 18:11 (UTC)

@Saren, thanks. Fixed it. Did you try it?

@clupenhauer, well that's unexpected. Really have to render something in Davinci Resolve, compile something and use Photoshop at the same time to make it stutter. But that's the 1080Ti probably...

There's a patch applied (281) which is supposed to fix energy saving problems on mobile GPUs. But then there's the difficult driver situation usind Bumblebee/Prime/Optimus-setups as well. Really have no clue what's going on.

Saren commented on 2019-01-23 13:15 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-23 13:23 (UTC) by Saren)

@Terence I have tried ditching the old revert patch in favor of the new patch, it introduces stutters when I play rhythm games using wine...

Deleting this package maybe unnecessary because it will confuse people when this package is not found in AUR when people update the system.

Also, regardless to delete this package or not, I think it's good idea to still include the old revert patch, just let people edit PKGBUILD to choose which to use.

__

@deezid I see your v7b PKGBUILD. I would like to steal it from you if is doing good. :)

BTW the v7b the v7 is identical.

ciupenhauer commented on 2019-01-22 18:03 (UTC)

@deezid Xorg

deezid commented on 2019-01-21 12:47 (UTC)

@clupenhauer do you use Xorg or Wayland?

ciupenhauer commented on 2019-01-19 20:33 (UTC)

@deezid I tried it but for whatever reason those patches don't work well on my mobile card in any formula. maybe it's because of the adaptive power mode? using the cpu a bit like firing up chrome with 10 tabs or rebuilding mutter makes gnome completely unusable

I'm reverting to traditional pkgbuild for now. Thanks for all the work!

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 .. 64 Next › Last »