Package Details: mutter-performance 48.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/mutter-performance.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: mutter-performance
Description: Window manager and compositor for GNOME
Upstream URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Groups: gnome
Conflicts: mutter
Provides: libmutter-16.so, mutter
Submitter: Terence
Maintainer: glorious-yellow
Last Packager: glorious-yellow
Votes: 77
Popularity: 0.015583
First Submitted: 2019-07-09 09:35 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-04-14 05:13 (UTC)

Required by (16)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

<deleted-account> commented on 2023-05-02 11:11 (UTC)

gnome-44 diffs: https://gist.github.com/FiestaLake/aaf26db49292840aef43210001b4e080

For people using [staging] & [gnome-unstable] branch (or [testing] branch in the near future).

Apply the patch with git am {patchname}.patch

<deleted-account> commented on 2023-02-13 04:41 (UTC)

Hi, I'm the co-maintainer of the package.

Unfortunately, my laptop's gpu died a few days ago. So I cannot bring lots of changes to the package. The only thing I can do right now is upgrading the package along with mr1441 only.

Sorry for the situation and I hope you understand it. If you want to be a co-maintainer of this package, please contact fiestalake@disroot.org and/or the other maintainers. Thanks.

<deleted-account> commented on 2022-10-27 15:54 (UTC)

gnome-43 diffs: https://gist.github.com/FiestaLake/d6d9e597fe693b3f55d92890880e463c

For people using [testing] branch.

Apply the patch with git am {patchname}.patch

Saren commented on 2018-08-30 14:52 (UTC) (edited on 2020-10-06 05:50 (UTC) by Saren)

If you are getting errors like fatal: bad revision '73e8cf32' while building this package, refer to PKGBUILD and see which patches caused this. Then, go to the related URLs, replace the commit hashes. If there are conflicts, comment out the patches.

Please notify me in comment section if this happens.

The optional performance patches are by default enabled.

A package for gnome-shell performance patches: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-performance/

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 .. 65 Next › Last »

Terence commented on 2019-01-27 19:36 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-27 20:48 (UTC) by Terence)

@Saren I pushed a new version, what do you think?

calindan2013 commented on 2019-01-27 14:50 (UTC)

this does not build, the packages is useless.

deezid commented on 2019-01-23 18:11 (UTC)

@Saren, thanks. Fixed it. Did you try it?

@clupenhauer, well that's unexpected. Really have to render something in Davinci Resolve, compile something and use Photoshop at the same time to make it stutter. But that's the 1080Ti probably...

There's a patch applied (281) which is supposed to fix energy saving problems on mobile GPUs. But then there's the difficult driver situation usind Bumblebee/Prime/Optimus-setups as well. Really have no clue what's going on.

Saren commented on 2019-01-23 13:15 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-23 13:23 (UTC) by Saren)

@Terence I have tried ditching the old revert patch in favor of the new patch, it introduces stutters when I play rhythm games using wine...

Deleting this package maybe unnecessary because it will confuse people when this package is not found in AUR when people update the system.

Also, regardless to delete this package or not, I think it's good idea to still include the old revert patch, just let people edit PKGBUILD to choose which to use.

__

@deezid I see your v7b PKGBUILD. I would like to steal it from you if is doing good. :)

BTW the v7b the v7 is identical.

ciupenhauer commented on 2019-01-22 18:03 (UTC)

@deezid Xorg

deezid commented on 2019-01-21 12:47 (UTC)

@clupenhauer do you use Xorg or Wayland?

ciupenhauer commented on 2019-01-19 20:33 (UTC)

@deezid I tried it but for whatever reason those patches don't work well on my mobile card in any formula. maybe it's because of the adaptive power mode? using the cpu a bit like firing up chrome with 10 tabs or rebuilding mutter makes gnome completely unusable

I'm reverting to traditional pkgbuild for now. Thanks for all the work!

deezid commented on 2019-01-19 20:11 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-19 20:18 (UTC) by deezid)

@Terence Added the latest version of the #168 patch and #216 patch to my PKGBUILD and it fixes some performance issues in other windows while 60p videos or animations are running even with the revert patch disabled. Activities zooming in and out still isn't as smooth though. Link: https://forum.manjaro.org/t/how-to-gnome-mutter-performance-patches/71989

@ciupenhauer Added a new version V6b with these other patches and the revert patch still applied - way faster - almost acceptable now - if you want to try it out.

ciupenhauer commented on 2019-01-19 19:15 (UTC)

@Terence removing this package is a bad idea, for my 970m mobile gpu the performance of the other pkgbuild was overall worse in places it matters most, this package might still be needed. U can leave it unmaintained if you wish but please don't remove it just yet

deezid commented on 2019-01-19 18:30 (UTC)

@Terence that would be great. Another question, why not using the official 3.30 for the 117 commit https://gitlab.gnome.org/vanvugt/mutter/commits/fix-offscreen-clones-3.30

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 .. 65 Next › Last »