Search Criteria
Package Details: nvidia-rt 580.95.05-2
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-rt.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | nvidia-rt |
| Description: | NVIDIA drivers for linux-rt |
| Upstream URL: | http://www.nvidia.com/ |
| Licenses: | custom |
| Submitter: | None |
| Maintainer: | noureddinex |
| Last Packager: | noureddinex |
| Votes: | 42 |
| Popularity: | 0.20 |
| First Submitted: | 2007-07-20 20:10 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-10-24 04:11 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- libgl (libglvnd-gitAUR, amdgpu-pro-oglp-legacyAUR, nvidia-340xx-utilsAUR, amdgpu-pro-oglpAUR, libglvnd)
- linux-rt
- nvidia-utils (nvidia-410xx-utilsAUR, nvidia-440xx-utilsAUR, nvidia-430xx-utilsAUR, nvidia-340xx-utilsAUR, nvidia-525xx-utilsAUR, nvidia-510xx-utilsAUR, nvidia-utils-teslaAUR, nvidia-470xx-utilsAUR, nvidia-550xx-utilsAUR, nvidia-390xx-utilsAUR, nvidia-vulkan-utilsAUR, nvidia-535xx-utilsAUR, nvidia-utils-betaAUR)
- linux-rt-headers (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 25 Next › Last »
phunni commented on 2022-11-05 17:22 (UTC)
I could really use this package as opposed to using a dkms version. I would therefore have to, presumably, maintain it myself. Am I right in thinking that it would simply be a case of keeping the version number up to date and then build/test?
Would the version simply be the latest driver version, or is there a version specific to rt patches?
phunni commented on 2020-07-14 18:47 (UTC)
So - is the plan to drop this package then? I'd rather use it than dkms because I use an immutable system, which means dkms can't be built on the running system.
bnavarro commented on 2019-04-24 14:37 (UTC)
Yes we probably can
oberon2007 commented on 2019-04-24 13:08 (UTC)
Ok. So I guess we can drop this package, then.
bnavarro commented on 2019-04-24 09:26 (UTC)
I didn't know about
nvidia-dkmsbut I can confirm that it works just fine withlinux-rtjhernberg commented on 2019-04-24 08:41 (UTC)
Yes, I've been using it for a long time now. There is a fix in nvidia-dkms to allow it building for linux-rt & linux-rt-lts. It's a lot easier than manually building nvidia-rt.
oberon2007 commented on 2019-04-23 22:42 (UTC)
@jhernberg does it build? I doubt it. See line 28 of the PKGBUILD
jhernberg commented on 2019-04-23 17:27 (UTC)
Why not use nvidia-dkms instead?
oberon2007 commented on 2019-04-23 16:54 (UTC)
Awesome @bnavarro, thanks! I have adjusted for now. The mismatch ignore won't hurt to keep in general for future updates, anyway ... ;)
bnavarro commented on 2019-04-23 15:26 (UTC) (edited on 2019-04-23 15:26 (UTC) by bnavarro)
@oberon2007 I had to change the
_extramodulesvariable toextramodules-rtand set the environment variableIGNORE_CC_MISMATCHto 1 (GCC has been updated since my lastlinux-rtbuild) but it works fine with these changes. Thanks!1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 25 Next › Last »