Please, could you better specify that this package comes from a custom non-official source code?
Search Criteria
Package Details: opencie 0.1.0-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/opencie.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | opencie |
| Description: | Digital signatures and verification with the Italian Electronic Identity Card (CIE) |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/M0Rf30/opencie |
| Licenses: | GPL-2.0-or-later |
| Submitter: | robertfoster |
| Maintainer: | robertfoster |
| Last Packager: | robertfoster |
| Votes: | 4 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2026-06-12 15:06 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2026-06-12 15:06 (UTC) |
Dependencies (10)
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classicAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR)
- opencie-pkcs11AUR
- pcsclite (pcsclite-gitAUR)
- clang (llvm-gitAUR, clang-minimal-gitAUR, clang17-binAUR, clang-static-gitAUR) (make)
- cmake (cmake3AUR, cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- fvm (fvm-gitAUR, fvm-sourcebuildAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR, git-wd40AUR) (make)
- ninja (ninja-gitAUR, ninja-memAUR, ninja-noemacs-gitAUR, ninja-kitwareAUR, ninja-fuchsia-gitAUR, n2-gitAUR) (make)
- patchelf (patchelf-gitAUR) (make)
- pkgconf (pkgconf-gitAUR) (make)
Required by (0)
Sources (1)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2
fortea commented on 2022-01-07 13:22 (UTC)
robertfoster commented on 2021-08-21 14:55 (UTC)
@giagor sorry but can't reproduce the issue
giagor commented on 2021-08-10 16:54 (UTC)
I've tried to build it today, I've installed the dafault suggested dependencies but it stops here: [10/38] Compiling C++ object libcie-pkcs11.so.p/Util_log.cpp.o FAILED: libcie-pkcs11.so.p/Util_log.cpp.o
Juma7C9 commented on 2020-11-25 21:46 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed that this package is missing crypto++ as a (make)dependency. Also, it would be better to add the base package to the conflicts array, to avoid errors on switching between them.
I'll keep mine close to upstream for now, as this should be an improvement on the original one.
Pinned Comments