Package Details: ppsspp-git 1.18.1.r1606.f573b0c72c-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/ppsspp-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: ppsspp-git
Description: A PSP emulator written in C++
Upstream URL: https://www.ppsspp.org/
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: ppsspp
Provides: ppsspp
Submitter: libcg
Maintainer: loathingkernel
Last Packager: loathingkernel
Votes: 43
Popularity: 0.019231
First Submitted: 2012-11-05 20:36 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-04-06 14:33 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

xdavidwu commented on 2021-02-09 03:30 (UTC)

Please don't flag this package out-of-date when you see the version string is. This is a VCS package. It always grabs the latest source from upstream repo and version string is generated at build time. As long as it builds fine, it is up-to-date. It is your responsibility to decide when to rebuild (update). I won't bump the version for you.

Also, I am running a daily build service, and by that, I can check that it builds fine daily. Ancient version string does not mean that I have loose track of the latest source.

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 14 Next › Last »

Neros commented on 2025-04-06 12:21 (UTC) (edited on 2025-04-06 15:16 (UTC) by Neros)

qt5-base and qt5-multimedia should be removed from dependencies if possible.

edit: thanks

loathingkernel commented on 2024-06-21 10:41 (UTC)

@kylon thanks for pointing me to that issue. I will consider it.

kylon commented on 2024-06-20 15:21 (UTC) (edited on 2024-06-20 15:23 (UTC) by kylon)

can we stop building qt variant since it is unmaintained, it lacks vulkan and recently it crashes a lot after recent qt updates? (see https://github.com/hrydgard/ppsspp/pull/19229 , qt should not be shipped)

it is just a waste of build time and cpu for no reason, also annoying to have 2 ppsspp in menu, just stick with officially supported and fully working sdl

<deleted-account> commented on 2024-04-01 20:32 (UTC)

This package doesn't build, aparently it needs the ext/OpenXR-SDK submodule in the _ppsspp_submodules

loathingkernel commented on 2023-10-03 23:15 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-03 23:15 (UTC) by loathingkernel)

@Technetium1 What? Why would it?

Technetium1 commented on 2023-10-03 22:38 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-03 23:18 (UTC) by Technetium1)

EDIT: Accidentally commented on the wrong package, sorry. Please disregard.

Shatur commented on 2023-08-25 15:12 (UTC)

@loathingkernel no problem, here is a patch that compiles on my PinePhone: https://pastebin.com/ZizYLtN7. I did it before the skeleton commit, so I would suggest to revert the last commit and apply this instead.

loathingkernel commented on 2023-08-25 08:35 (UTC)

@Shatur The reason I asked you to write a patch and send it is because I can't test the PKGBUILD on aarch64. That being said, I have added the required skeleton in the PKGBUILD to support multiarch. I will be waiting for your patch.

Shatur commented on 2023-08-24 22:26 (UTC)

@loathingkernel sorry for bothering, but could you add support aarch64 now since ffmpeg compilation script is now in place?

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 14 Next › Last »