Search Criteria
Package Details: prusa-slicer-git 2.7.4-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/prusa-slicer-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | prusa-slicer-git |
Description: | G-code generator for 3D printers (Prusa fork of Slic3r) (git version) |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/prusa3d/PrusaSlicer |
Licenses: | AGPL3 |
Conflicts: | prusa-slicer |
Submitter: | Salamandar |
Maintainer: | Salamandar |
Last Packager: | Salamandar |
Votes: | 15 |
Popularity: | 0.094144 |
First Submitted: | 2019-07-08 08:14 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-04-11 14:51 (UTC) |
Dependencies (8)
- dbus (dbus-gitAUR, dbus-selinuxAUR)
- intel-tbb (onetbb-gitAUR, onetbb)
- clang (llvm-gitAUR, clang-minimal-gitAUR, clang17-binAUR) (make)
- cmake (cmake3AUR, cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- eigen (eigen-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- gtest (googletest-gitAUR) (make)
- ninja (ninja-kitwareAUR, ninja-fuchsia-gitAUR, ninja-gitAUR, ninja-jobserverAUR, ninja-memAUR, ninja-noemacs-gitAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 15 Next › Last »
Salamandar commented on 2021-11-05 10:41 (UTC)
@jurriaan your patch didnt apply but I managed to fix the openexr patch :)
Should be fine.
Although, it seems like the patch isn't required anymore. I'll confirm this soon.
For me the build succeeds but the tests fail. Not for you ?
jurriaan commented on 2021-11-05 10:08 (UTC) (edited on 2021-11-05 10:14 (UTC) by jurriaan)
@Salamandar thanks for looking into it!
It still doesn't work here, interestingly your package version number contains a higher release number than I get. Not sure what is happening there. The current latest version is
2.4.0.beta1.r65.gaff9e1f7e
according to makepkg which updated the version number when building.Anyhow, I fixed the patch and
PKGBUILD
so it works on my system, see https://gist.github.com/jurriaan/a2ca25f1bca0250c9b1181ffcf75bb6eThis resulted in a successful build:
Salamandar commented on 2021-11-05 10:02 (UTC)
@jurriaan Well that's really weird because I just rebuilt the package (and hunted down another issue upstream related to boost) and the patch applied correctly. I'll check what's wrong. Maybe the patch was accepted upstream and it fails silently on my end.
jurriaan commented on 2021-11-05 09:45 (UTC)
@Salamandar this package has been failing on my system for quite a while now as well
FYI, the latest beta1 version that was just published cannot apply the patch properly:
Salamandar commented on 2021-11-05 09:31 (UTC)
@slimb I'm sorry but no. Who are you ?
DCengineer commented on 2021-10-25 01:01 (UTC)
Looks like none of the patches work anymore, possibly due to upstream changes.
cculpepper1214 commented on 2021-09-09 01:29 (UTC)
@Athemis , do you have an updated patch? I'm having trouble applying yours, it says it fails on the first hunk.
Athemis commented on 2021-08-06 15:56 (UTC)
@Salamandar The openexr3 patch doesn't apply cleanly anymore. See here for an updated patch.
Salamandar commented on 2021-07-13 14:13 (UTC)
@Lukas1818 thanks for the patch, I pushed it after testing. Sorry for the rant also :)
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 15 Next › Last »