Package Details: rslsync 3.1.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/rslsync.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: rslsync
Description: Resilio Sync (ex:BitTorrent Sync) - automatically sync files via secure, distributed technology
Upstream URL: https://www.getsync.com
Licenses: custom:resilio
Submitter: widowild
Maintainer: widowild (fryfrog)
Last Packager: fryfrog
Votes: 363
Popularity: 0.023559
First Submitted: 2016-09-25 13:20 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-11-02 22:23 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 57 Next › Last »

EarthMind commented on 2018-01-02 12:37 (UTC)

I'm having that issue also

mart-e commented on 2017-12-21 14:33 (UTC)

Same here, the sha256sum for the x86_64 is 9938c2ecb8f9c6a49f322e02730bdb4efee165627bc6dea9ba0f60dbc7058bf0 Possible that there is a new version released?

TamasBarta commented on 2017-12-21 12:00 (UTC) (edited on 2017-12-21 12:02 (UTC) by TamasBarta)

Hi,

When trying to upgrade, validity check fails, I get the following output:

==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    rslsync.service ... Passed
    rslsync_user.service ... Passed
    rslsync.conf ... Passed
==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums...
    rslsync_x64-2.5.10.tar.gz ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

This is only on one of my machines, but between upgrading the two, some days passed, it is possible, that the resource file changed.

widowild commented on 2017-12-19 12:38 (UTC)

2.5.10 - Fixed crash when syncing encrypted folders - Improved saving configuration on exiting - Minor improvements and fixes

EarthMind commented on 2017-09-27 17:16 (UTC)

Hi fryfrog That was my initial post yes. But what I misunderstood was that the PGP signatures are for the .deb and .rpm packages. The tar archives aren't signed in any way nor any separate signature file is available for those. I edited my post shortly after realizing this. Thank you for the update too

fryfrog commented on 2017-09-26 18:03 (UTC) (edited on 2017-09-26 18:04 (UTC) by fryfrog)

@EarthMind, can you point at an example of using PGP signatures in a AUR package? All the ones I manage and have looked at use md5/sha. And of them, rslsync is the only one that changes the package hash w/o changing the version. :/ "Why don't you do the verification the proper way, that is by verifying the PGP signature instead of adding file checksums, which as far as I know, are not provided by Resilio themselves?" Also, for some reason I can see the above in my email, but not your comment. :/

EarthMind commented on 2017-09-26 17:50 (UTC) (edited on 2017-09-26 17:59 (UTC) by EarthMind)

Hi I also get a checksum error when installing it again. It worked before though.

fryfrog commented on 2017-09-14 04:12 (UTC)

I just stuck a `chmod 644` on that file in the PKGBUILD, give it a try now. It isn't bullshit, its just an issue that needed to be noticed and reported before it could be fixed. Try being less of an asshole. ;)

tee commented on 2017-09-13 23:30 (UTC)

$ cp /etc/rslsync.conf ~/.config/rslsync/rslsync.conf cp: cannot open '/etc/rslsync.conf' for reading: Permission denied Well this is just bullshit because the arch specifically says not to copy with sudo

fryfrog commented on 2017-09-06 20:31 (UTC)

If you need a co-maintainer, I'm happy to help out. :)

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 57 Next › Last »