Package Details: shaderc-non-semantic-debug 2024.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/shaderc-non-semantic-debug.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: shaderc-non-semantic-debug
Description: Collection of tools, libraries and tests for shader compilation - non-semantic debug patch
Upstream URL: https://github.com/google/shaderc
Licenses: Apache-2.0
Conflicts: shaderc-non-semantic-debug
Provides: shaderc-non-semantic-debug
Submitter: weirdbeard
Maintainer: weirdbeard
Last Packager: weirdbeard
Votes: 4
Popularity: 0.70
First Submitted: 2024-04-13 14:12 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-31 21:37 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

xiota commented on 2024-07-22 01:05 (UTC)

@weirdbeard What is the point of keeping a useless package?

weirdbeard commented on 2024-07-15 15:00 (UTC)

I have no plans to take down this package

xiota commented on 2024-07-15 07:15 (UTC)

Probably time to delete this. The only package that depends on this currently fails to build and should be rewritten to patch and build the library from scratch.

rubin55 commented on 2024-05-31 23:59 (UTC) (edited on 2024-06-01 00:11 (UTC) by rubin55)

Just rebuild latest package; I can't install this package anymore apparently:

$ sudo pacman -S shaderc-non-semantic-debug
warning: shaderc-non-semantic-debug-2024.1-1 is up to date -- reinstalling
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: installing shaderc-non-semantic-debug (2024.1-1) breaks dependency 'shaderc' required by libplacebo
:: installing shaderc-non-semantic-debug (2024.1-1) breaks dependency 'libshaderc_shared.so=1-64' required by libplacebo

Since it's only pcsx2 and pcsx2-git packages that depend on this, can't you just do the shaderc-semantic-debug stuff as part of the pscx2 packages? I've had a lot of breakage ever since this package was introduced and I wouldn't mind it going away sometime soon (I know this can't have been an easy package to maintain for you either).

weirdbeard commented on 2024-05-31 23:55 (UTC)

Yes