Package Details: speedtest++ 1.15.r72.b743996-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/speedtest++.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: speedtest++
Description: Unofficial speedtest.net cli using raw TCP for better accuracy. Written in C++.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/taganaka/SpeedTest
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: mrxx
Maintainer: mrxx
Last Packager: mrxx
Votes: 16
Popularity: 0.150741
First Submitted: 2019-11-20 11:59 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-11 22:25 (UTC)

Dependencies (5)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

mrxx commented on 2024-09-11 22:26 (UTC)

Well, if it makes you happy, why not.

m040601 commented on 2024-09-10 17:09 (UTC) 

Sorry, but I do not quite understand how anybody would type "Written in C++" when looking
for a speed test tool.

I think you also dont understand what the "Description" field is usefull for. Especially in this case, with dozens of tools.

Putting "Written in C++" is primarly not meant to help the minority of people looking for stuff written in C++.

It is meant to help, anyone, quickly look at a very very long list of similar results, and quickly choose and or discard what they want or do not want.

mrxx commented on 2024-09-09 12:49 (UTC)

Sorry, but I do not quite understand how anybody would type "Written in C++" when looking for a speed test tool.

If you search for these words separately, of course there will be dozens of matches, as they are quite generic.

But if you start typing them together, "speedt" already suggests this package as first hit.

m040601 commented on 2024-09-08 08:47 (UTC)

If you search the AUR for "speed" "test" there are dozens and dozens of tools with similar name written in many different languages.

It gets confusing for the end user to quickly know which one is which.

  Description:   Unofficial speedtest.net cli using raw TCP for better accuracy

Could you edit that "Description" to something like,

  Description:   Unofficial speedtest.net cli using raw TCP for better accuracy. Written in C++

Doesnt cost you anything.

Thanks in advance.

rbr1685 commented on 2024-04-08 00:48 (UTC)

Apr 8th update has resolved whatever issue I was having - thanks

mrxx commented on 2024-04-08 00:01 (UTC)

Works fine for me, anybody else experiencing this issue?

rbr1685 commented on 2024-04-05 07:10 (UTC)

Currently broken!

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::invalid_argument' what(): stof Aborted (core dumped)

mrxx commented on 2021-11-20 19:20 (UTC)

The version number is updated automatically on reinstall as it pulls from git.

Anyways, I've updated it to 1.14.r71.

jimeral commented on 2021-11-18 07:21 (UTC)

the version number is broken, its version number is 1.14.r71.0f63cfb-1 instead of the intended version of 1.14.r68.1877803-1.

mrxx commented on 2020-11-16 23:31 (UTC)

Updated.

1 2 Next › Last »