Package Details: ventoy-bin 1.1.05-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/ventoy-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: ventoy-bin
Description: A new bootable USB solution
Upstream URL: http://www.ventoy.net
Keywords: boot image iso multiboot usb
Licenses: GPL-3.0-or-later
Conflicts: ventoy
Provides: ventoy
Submitter: DuckSoft
Maintainer: DuckSoft (KokaKiwi, yochananmarqos, Kr1ss)
Last Packager: yochananmarqos
Votes: 380
Popularity: 8.12
First Submitted: 2020-05-19 06:14 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-02-24 18:30 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 18 Next › Last »

solsticedhiver commented on 2021-05-02 18:47 (UTC)

exfatprogs package provides exfat-utils so ventoy-bin package installs fine but breaks later when running ventoy:

./tool/VentoyWorker.sh: line 284: mkexfatfs : command not found

It would be fine if one can use exfatprogs instead of exfat-utils because gparted rely on exfatprogs. Otherwise, find a way to warn about the possible problem.

Thank you.

FirstAirBender commented on 2021-03-31 04:38 (UTC)

In that case, you might as well just make it a link to /opt/ventoy/CreatePersistentImg.sh.

ln -s /opt/ventoy/CreatePersistentImg.sh /usr/bin/ventoy-persistent

Kr1ss commented on 2021-03-30 03:15 (UTC)

Thanks @FirstAirBender, the image location should now be fixed and the image will be created in the directory where you run ventoy-persistent.

FirstAirBender commented on 2021-03-29 19:46 (UTC)

Why does the ventoy-persistent script create the persistence data inside /opt/ventoy? This is contrary to what is said in the documentation. The file should be created in the current directory.

Just sudo /opt/ventoy/CreatePersistentImg.sh ... is all I needed to create the persistence file

saverio commented on 2021-03-28 16:21 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for this utility, it's very useful!

Kr1ss commented on 2021-03-28 12:50 (UTC)

the spelling in the release assets is correct...

Yes, it was me who made that mistake. Non-native english speaker as well 8)

Kr1ss commented on 2021-03-28 12:14 (UTC)

Yes, I'd rather use the correct form.

DuckSoft commented on 2021-03-28 12:12 (UTC) (edited on 2021-03-28 12:20 (UTC) by DuckSoft)

@C0rn3j wow i didn't even notice that... i am not a native speaker :(

so let's go with ventoy-persistent?


UPDATES: double checked that the spelling in the release assets is correct...

so no problem, just move on :)

Kr1ss commented on 2021-03-28 12:10 (UTC)

Yes correct ! Thx @C0rn3j. :)