@spider-mario: It's not about AUR, it's about [community].
Search Criteria
Package Details: virtualbox-ext-oracle 7.1.4-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/virtualbox-ext-oracle.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | virtualbox-ext-oracle |
| Description: | Oracle VM VirtualBox Extension Pack |
| Upstream URL: | https://www.virtualbox.org/ |
| Keywords: | virtualbox |
| Licenses: | custom:PUEL |
| Submitter: | seblu |
| Maintainer: | seblu (eworm) |
| Last Packager: | eworm |
| Votes: | 1361 |
| Popularity: | 1.50 |
| First Submitted: | 2010-12-24 16:48 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-10-15 16:10 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- virtualbox (virtualbox6-binAUR, virtualbox-svnAUR, virtualbox6.1-binAUR, virtualbox-binAUR)
- rdesktop (optional) – client to connect vm via RDP
Required by (2)
- virtualbox-bin (optional)
- virtualbox6.1-bin (optional)
Sources (1)
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-09-22 07:58 (UTC)
spider-mario commented on 2012-09-22 07:47 (UTC)
I think it’s OK. The binaries are not redistributed, the PKGBUILD just automates the download from Oracle’s website, so they can still “keep track of how many people are downloading these binaries”.
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-09-18 14:15 (UTC)
@muflone: Please, read the comments, at least the ones from yesterday.
Muflone commented on 2012-09-18 13:45 (UTC)
Please update this package to the version 4.2.0
felixonmars commented on 2012-09-17 17:23 (UTC)
Oh, sorry to hear that :(
seblu commented on 2012-09-17 17:21 (UTC)
https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Licensing_FAQ
Look into section 7. It's dead.
seblu commented on 2012-09-17 17:15 (UTC)
We must ask permission to Oracle. I will look into this.
felixonmars commented on 2012-09-17 17:07 (UTC)
Is there any chance that this package grants by InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH to re-distribute from binary?
seblu commented on 2012-09-17 17:00 (UTC)
I will update this package when I will move virtualbox 4.2 out of testing.
graysky commented on 2012-09-17 16:58 (UTC)
Yeah, the official package which !=4.2 when I posted that.
Pinned Comments
seblu commented on 2019-04-25 17:41 (UTC)
There is no version dependency on this package on purpose! You could read comments back from 2011 to understand why.