Search Criteria
Package Details: weakauras-companion 5.3.1-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/weakauras-companion.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | weakauras-companion |
| Description: | Provide the missing link between Wago.io and World of Warcraft.(Use system-wide electron) |
| Upstream URL: | https://weakauras.wtf/ |
| Keywords: | electron wago warcraft weakauras weakauras-companion world-of-warcraft |
| Licenses: | GPL-2.0-or-later |
| Submitter: | zxp19821005 |
| Maintainer: | zxp19821005 |
| Last Packager: | zxp19821005 |
| Votes: | 1 |
| Popularity: | 0.003557 |
| First Submitted: | 2024-11-20 08:30 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2026-02-09 01:26 (UTC) |
Dependencies (8)
- electron40 (electron40-binAUR)
- curl (curl-gitAUR, curl-c-aresAUR) (make)
- gendesk (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR, git-wd40AUR) (make)
- jq (jq-gitAUR, jq-staticAUR, jaq-binAUR, jaq-gitAUR) (make)
- npm (python-nodejs-wheelAUR, npm-corepackAUR) (make)
- nvm (nvm-gitAUR) (make)
- pnpm (pnpm-corepackAUR, pnpm-binAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
zxp19821005 commented on 2025-05-08 04:51 (UTC)
@cipopescu I'm sorry, I've no idea about that. Is there any one can help to solve that?
cipopescu commented on 2025-05-02 11:45 (UTC)
I'm getting some
ENOENTerrors, the app can't update my auras :(zxp19821005 commented on 2025-01-28 06:50 (UTC)
@artafinde Thanks for your reminder, added it.
artafinde commented on 2025-01-25 16:34 (UTC)
This needs the
gendeskdependency and to conflict withweakauras-companion-binpkgzxp19821005 commented on 2025-01-22 02:31 (UTC)
@kogasa Thanks for your feedback. I've fixed it as your suggestion.
kogasa commented on 2025-01-21 22:04 (UTC)
This failed to build with Paru because
build()references${electronDist}which is defined inprepare(). This makes-c.electronDistrefer to itself, which causes an error that looks likeTo fix it, move the line
into
build(), or outside ofprepare(). (I normally wouldn't suggest a change specifically for third-party tool compatibility, but doesn't it make more sense to define the variable in the scope where it's used, anyway?)